Minnesota Assassin Arrested

He's a rank amateur, only thing he did right was his face mask. Finding a "death list" in his car, other evidence. A little suspicious IMHO.
The "kamikaze assassin".-Charles J. Guiteau, Leon Czolgosz, Giuseppe Zangara, Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, Arthur Bremer-has been the norm in our history. The Lincoln assassins-another bunch of clowns, though if Lincoln had been better guarded...
I'm not suspicious of the lists. He visited 4 homes on the list, killing or wounding at two, one wasn't home, and police presence apparently spooked him at another. He didn't go to more because he abandoned his vehicle and most weapons at the fourth address after exchanging gunfire with the police.When working human sources we refer to this as 'corroboration.'

This was political assassination by a voter of one party against only members of the other. Facts can be uncomfortable. If Boelter confesses to the crime and details his motivation in open court, the Alex Joneses of the world will say it was only because 'them' and 'they' forced him to do so. Horse manure.
 
Last edited:
He's in his late 50's. Even if he gets the death penalty he'll die in prison before it happens. At least he knows what his retirement is going to be. It won't surprise me if they determine he is too insane to prosecute.
Not arguing to argue, but I had a minor role in an eventual federal death penalty case. That case was just less than 16 years from conviction to execution.

The decedent/defendant was an especially nasty piece of work… But I doubted the execution would ever happen as there had been a dozen years of a shadow ban on the death penalty in the federal system

This Minnesota case seems deserving of a capital case treatment based on the facts as known. The many factors that come together for the rather rare federal death penalty prosecution are present - DOJ leaders willing to try a capital case, the defendant egregiously targeting the deceased, strong evidential record and a defendant whom a capital punishment is easy to get past a jury.
 
Got this nutcase in time. Right?

“A former Coast Guard lieutenant and sharpshooter has been arrested for allegedly making threats to kill President Trump.

A 19-page Federal Bureau of Investigation affidavit lists out scores of alleged social media threats by Peter Stinson, who served 33 years in the U.S. Coast Guard through 2021, and also served as a Federal Emergency Management Agency instructor”



 
Last edited:
“A former Coast Guard lieutenant and sharpshooter has been arrested for allegedly making threats to kill President Trump.

A 19-page Federal Bureau of Investigation affidavit lists out scores of alleged social media threats by Peter Stinson, who served 33 years in the U.S. Coast Guard through 2021, and also served as a Federal Emergency Management Agency instructor”


33 years and a lieutenant? Even in the USCG?
Maybe someone can explain that to me.

Following Biku’s lead, it is usually instructive to read the actual indictment. Let’s you draw your own more informed conclusions. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25977167-stinson-affidavit/

Per the affidavit, Stinson last shot Sharpshooter in 1989.
1989 was the year Taylor Swift was born and Russia was still the USSR. We were still using a rotary dial phone at my house then.
 
Stay tuned.

“Stinson is charged with making threats to kill the president. He is expected to be in federal court in Alexandria at 2 p.m. on Wednesday”
 
His pension will go a long way in Federal prison. Does Antifa qualify as an additional benefit?
Nope. His pension is gone If he is convicted of a crime against the national security of the United States (you’ll find a listing of these types of crimes under 5 USC Section 8312).

Which has nothing to do with Boelter shooting for shooting 4 people specifically because they were Democrats.
 
33 years and a lieutenant? Even in the USCG?
Maybe someone can explain that to me.

Following Biku’s lead, it is usually instructive to read the actual indictment. Let’s you draw your own more informed conclusions. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25977167-stinson-affidavit/

Per the affidavit, Stinson last shot Sharpshooter in 1989.
1989 was the year Taylor Swift was born and Russia was still the USSR. We were still using a rotary dial phone at my house then.
If I could only qualify as a 'sharpshooter,' I'd probably be, well, an O-2 after 33 years of service.
 
It is partly the arrogance of, "I should decide who lives and dies." He probably considers him a patriot and hero. However when he had to face other armed men, he folded. Some hero...
 
33 years and a lieutenant? Even in the USCG?
Maybe someone can explain that to me.

Following Biku’s lead, it is usually instructive to read the actual indictment. Let’s you draw your own more informed conclusions. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25977167-stinson-affidavit/

Per the affidavit, Stinson last shot Sharpshooter in 1989.
1989 was the year Taylor Swift was born and Russia was still the USSR. We were still using a rotary dial phone at my house then.
That Stinson bloke is a clown. I only read a third of the affidavit because by then it had become a cartoon script where Barney Bear's bag of grain has a hole and he wonders why he has every chicken in the valley following him.

As for lists, they are not suspicious. Boelter is like many of these fruit loops who want you to know who, what, where, and why. I'm pretty sure printing it all out with a manifesto boosts their credibility and certainty in their own tiny minds.

The real nasties are the ones who hide it all to establish control. See Stephen Paddock and the events of 1 October 2017 in Las Vegas. He left behind a big fat zero, and I've seen interviews with survivors and family members of the deceased where it is clear that having no "why" bothers them greatly.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top