Mod 19 vs 66

sinbad71

Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
25
Reaction score
14
Location
Wisconsin
I am trying to determine the future collector value of two different S&W's. #1 is a 4" model 19-3, nickel with original box and grips. #2 is a 4" model 66 no dash, stainless sights but no box. Both guns I would rate at 97%-98%. Seeing as I can't afford both, I want to make the smartest long term purchase possible. Either gun would become a safe queen, so use isn't a consideration. I love 'em both. All opinions appreciated.
 
Register to hide this ad
Personally, as described, neither gun meets my criteria as a true "Collector Grade" gun. Neither on is particularly rare or unusual nor are they "NIB" condition.

However, that doesn't mean you cannot keep them a while and make money reselling them at a later time. But, that all comes down to what price you can get them for.

Personally, I would lean towards the Model 19 simply because I have a love affair with Nickel 19s. :)

But, for me, it all comes down to price Out The Door.

Bob
 
Last edited:
Factory correct box and stocks makes the difference, if all else is indeed equal; 19-3. ;)
 
I'd have to say the 19-3 with box if you are going to just look at it, however since it is not 100% or NIB the value will not be on par with those that are. I also see the 19 as having a slight edge right now on people's grail gun lists.

Personally I'd get the 66 no dash and shoot it. You can always buff out the finish on a stainless gun and really get it close to looking NIB, even after quite a few rounds.
 
As a collection piece the 19-3 is the one. It has condition and all the bits and pieces that collectors like. If you're looking for a shooter other will be great.

I also think, in the long run, blued and nickel prices will out pace most stainless guns. One of the things that drive prices is finish quality. Most of can easily judge a blue or nickel finish. That is much harder with a stainless gun. Anyone can see the difference between a 80% blue finish and 90% plus finish. Like other have said you can polish a stainless gun back to near new looking. I think as collectors only the rare stainless piece will be a good bet. The more common stainless revolvers even in high perceived condition will not keep up in price with their blue and nickel counter parts. Of course that is just this one guys opinion.
 
I can't see either of those guns being a "safe queen". They were both meant to be shot. Me I would get the 66-0 and shoot the snot out of it.
 
Bill Bates has this one right. Blue and nickel guns are seeing an increase in desirability because the original bright blue and nickel are no longer in production. Stainless is the material of choice for most modern weapons. Collectors want what they can't have so the nickel 19-3 is the winner here.
 
The trend for gun purchasers today is towards stainless steel. IMHO that means that blued steel may increase in price tomorrow.
 
I am not sure but if the 66 has stainless sights it might be a little more on the scarce side so down the road it might be worth a couple of bucks more. Someone with more knowledge than me might be able to shed more light on that.
I would buy the one that jumps out at you the most because when it comes right down to it, it will be a long time before either of these guns appreciates much more than they have to this point. This is a gun that you buy for the joy of ownership not as a retirement investment.
 
If you're look I ng to do much shooting with the gun, go for the stainless 66. Much easier to set the finish back to what it looked like when new. If you're going to put it in the safe and stare at it, and admire the beauty, go with the 19. They've changed enough in what they make now that if they decide to make them again the originals will command a premium.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top