Decipher
Member
I'm about to pull the trigger (pun intended) on a 15-22 and have been kicking around which model I want. After handling the MOE version yesterday, I realized the MOE version seems like a hard justification for the price tag. There is no weight savings with the stock, the grip is all about personal preference (I don't care for it one bit...maybe if it had a better feel but it's just hard plastic), and the MBUS offer no better sight picture than the standard sights on the regular version.
I built my own AR and spared no expense. I have the exact Mapgul stock found on the MOE 15-22 and MBUS on my AR, so it's nothing against Magpul. I love their products. I just see no real advantage to spending the extra money on the MOE version. Maybe if there were weight savings or the grip was substantially better, the price tag would become justified. The only real nod I can give the MOE version is the single-point snap-in on the lower.
Anyone wish they would have saved the money on the MOE version and just bought a set of MBUS for $40? Or, conversely, wish they would have spent the extra money for the MOE instead of the standard? I can purchase the standard version for $366 shipped with the threaded barrel.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
I built my own AR and spared no expense. I have the exact Mapgul stock found on the MOE 15-22 and MBUS on my AR, so it's nothing against Magpul. I love their products. I just see no real advantage to spending the extra money on the MOE version. Maybe if there were weight savings or the grip was substantially better, the price tag would become justified. The only real nod I can give the MOE version is the single-point snap-in on the lower.
Anyone wish they would have saved the money on the MOE version and just bought a set of MBUS for $40? Or, conversely, wish they would have spent the extra money for the MOE instead of the standard? I can purchase the standard version for $366 shipped with the threaded barrel.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk