Moral question

oldman45

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
3,970
Reaction score
335
Location
Louisiana
In 1999, an elderly friend wanted to sell a unfired Marlin 336 in 30/30 caliber. For whatever reason, he was asking $200 for it and I paid what he was asking.

Now the man is close to death's door due to age and declining health. He has a grandson that is in his late 20's that called me today asking me to sell him the rifle for what I paid his grandfather for the gun.

The rifle still remains unfired.

My situation is I do not often sell a gun and while I do not use the gun, I do not care to sell this one, especially for $200.

What would you guys do? Sell the grandson the gun? Not sell the gun to him? Raise the price and sell it to him?

I understand wanting a certain gun that may have memories but I also know the value of the gun is more than $200 but that is what the man wanted for it and what I paid for it.
 
Register to hide this ad
Since the gun is unfired, I seriously doubt that there were memories made with it.

Unless you made an agreement with the grandfather to sell the gun back to him for the same price- you have no obligation to sell it at all.

Ancient gun trader's trick- "Sell it back to me for what I sold it to you if you ever need the money."

I think the grandson sees a way to make some money, or get a cheap rifle.

Tell him you have fond memories of the old feller, and the rifle told you it doesn't want to leave. :) That will end it. ;)
Don't raise the price- keep it.

How did the grandson find out you had it- that is the question.
 
Last edited:
if I knew the players well enough to know the intent of the grandson, I may consider giving him the rifle and calling the $200 a favor ... provided my heart tells me its a family history preservation thing.
on the other hand if the punk just wants to liquidate it ... allow him $20 profit margin against retail.
 
The Real Reason

I'd tell the young man that I would give the matter some consideration…Ask the grandson why he wants the rifle now.

Then in a few months I'd ask him again why he wants the rifle…You see what I'm getting' at.

Su Amigo,
Dave
 
I'd tell the young man that I would give the matter some consideration…Ask the grandson why he wants the rifle now.

Then in a few months I'd ask him again why he wants the rifle…You see what I'm getting' at.

Su Amigo,
Dave

I like it.:) Really, ask why the grandson wants it? Especially since so much time has passed. It's not like what was mentioned, that there is fond memories of hunting with grand Dad and bagging his first deer with the rifle.

Not knowing any more about the family dynamics, I do not see where there is any obligation on your part to sell it to him. Did grand Dad promise the gun to him when he got older??
 
Tell him politely that you have no desire to sell it at this time. However, tell him that if you decide to sell at some time in the future, you will most certainly give him the right of first refusal at a price to be determined by you.
 
First things first! What is the year of mfr.?
Is this a NIB from the 70's, or does it only date back to the late 90's?
Post the ser.# if you don't know....
 
First and foremost you are under no moral obligation to sell him the rifle at any price. You paid what was asked, so if you wish to sell the rifle to him he can pay what you ask and I would ask current market value.
 
You have no moral obligation to sell it back to him. You are the owner.
I question why the grandson seems to be more concerned about getting this rifle back, at a steal price, than the condition, death and loss of his grandfather. Sounds very materialistic to me.
 
tell him to buy you one just like it and you will trade

Probably the best answer. Since I believe from your writing the kid specified the $200 price (rather than "I will pay you whatever you gave Grandpa for it"), his intentions seem pretty obvious. I don't see any moral obligation. Probably just someone thinking he can lay a guilt trip on you.
 
I agree with the guys above, if the guy never shot it there can't be any sentimental attachment, and if the grandson wants it bad enough he should get you an exact replacement. I would if it was me and I wanted it. Then again if it was me you would never have gotten it in the first place! :D
 
The kid's grandfather isn't even dead yet and he's going after things? Non-starter around here...not happening.

Bob
 
You answered your own question...."I do not care to sell this one..."
The gun was/is unfired, so I don't see how it could have any sentimental value to grandson. Keep the gun, and don't feel guilty about it.
 
By the title of your thread we can see this is bothering you. I personally don't think it's so much a moral question as a relationship question. If you and the original owner were very , very close friends that's one thing. If however it was merely a gun transaction then their really is no moral dilemma involved.

I think the best way to opt out of any further problems with either is to simply state it's not for sale and it will eventually be willed to your offspring. JMHO

Steve
 
What does gramps have to say about this? Since he is your "friend" and he's dying, I'd grant his wish whatever that might be.

By the way, how does the grandson know of this transaction back in the 90's?
 
I'd say the grandfather expressed his wishes in 1999. Had he intended to save the rifle for his grandson, he would not have offered it for sale. I can imagine situations where one might feel morally obliged to return family heirlooms, etc. but this isn't one of them. If you don't want to sell the rifle, keep it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top