How about sparks everytime a bullet hits.
Ok, I was flipping channels the other night and caught the end of 'Escape from New York'. At the end, the lady has a Model 67 WITH A SCOPE...she's shooting at the bad guy in the Cadillac with the chandeliers for headlights, she cranks off 6 rounds (no endless 6 shooter). Of course she misses him...guess because it was AT NIGHT the scope didn't help much... I don't recall ever seeing a 67 drilled and tapped for a scope...
How about rapper ICE T who now plays a Detective on Law Order SVU. He had some real foul rap songs, anti Cop and other stuff before he found out how much money he could make on TV
...
The idea is to establish reality in an effects or action sequence. While the story is fictional the physics and the mechanics of the devices involved needs to coincide with reality in order to sell the scene. If it's science fiction or fantasy then it's ok for devices to function in a fantastic manner.
These shows are dramas and police procedurals. Based on reality. As such the devices should work as in real life. While it's true most people won't notice a few silly discrepancies I find it distracting and takes away from the story. I've done effects work for some independant films and even though the stories were fictional and fantasy based (zombie films) the action sequences relied heavily on the establishment of reality.
To me it's just sloppy filmaking.
My favorite-
Hero is pursuing BG through a large building/warehouse/woods/wherever.
He has cleared many rooms, walked down several hallways, up a staircase or two, and been expecting an immediate encounter with said BG, who is armed with something good like a SMG with a 1000 rd magazine.
The music eventually tells us contact is iminent, so the hero FINALLY racks his riot gun or the slide on his Superpistol to chamber a round.
Good thinking, Ace.![]()
The reality of the weapons were established. Good point though, even if it was established that a machete was real by hacking off a tree limb, it wasn't particularly realistic that a head could easily be lopped off by a casual one handed swing. And the amount of blood used was a filmakers quantity. So yeah, a little fantasy does sometimes help with a story line.if everything was 100 percent accurate, there would be no fantasy to it. the viewer would not get "lost" in the story because the story would be dull and boring, and every show would fail. it is fantasy based on reality, not fantasy mimicking reality.
so in the zombie films you did effects work on, there was not anything that was less than 100% accurate , other than the zombies walking around? nothing at all? hmmmmm...hard to believe that a zombie movie would be 100% real except for the zombies...
A lot of people are very good target shooters using the cup and saucer hold.
It's just not a good hold for recoil control and follow up shots.
Stephen J. Cannell.
You didn't always watch his shows for accuracy but you liked the stories and characters.
When he was alive, we called him Stephen J. Canada. He shot alot of his "hollywood" shows in Vancouver. He made the money but so did the Vancouver CANADA film crews, not the crews in Hollywood.
What really scares me is these geniuses love to step up to a microphone and tell the rest of us right from wrong and how we should live our lives.
The REALLY scary thing is that so many people listen and take all that trash for gospel....![]()
A friend of mine blew up his Glock with factory ammo and seeing the magazine exit the bottom of the grip and dig itself into the ground cured me of any notion of using the cup and saucer hold.