MT PET PEEVE WITH THE CCW PISTOL CENTER BLADE TRIGGER SAFETY

Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
19,327
Reaction score
30,282
I often question things that sometimes don't get much air time or maybe thought about often. Maybe because of my OCD, maybe because I always notice details and maybe just because most people go through life not being bothered by the same things that annoy me. :o

The center blade safeties on many of the new breed of carry gun triggers just bother's me - one of the reasons is because they tend to pinch my finger when pulling the trigger sometimes, maybe because they can potentially get jammed by a piece of debris but most of all because to me they are essentially a useless piece on the trigger that gives you nothing more than a false sense of safety and security!!

If you inadvertently have your finger on the trigger while reholstering, unholstering , etc. and the gun gets caught or pushed forward it will STILL go bang! As a drop safety I see no real reason for it as all the modern designs have drop safeties built into them. If the trigger gets caught on something and gets a strong enough force applied to pull it, it will pull the center blade safety anyway. So the REAL point of it is...... ???? More than likely, just a feel - good, do - nothing lawyer devise for law suits or anti law suits.

And...... that is one of the major reasons I so much prefer the Sig P365 over many of the clones by other manufacturer's - it has NO center trigger blade. It has an internal drop safety and they offer the P365 with and without a manual safety. I carried mine for 3 years without the manual safety feature and then added one - they came ready for installation even in the beginning of production. To me that is a REAL safety that is efficient, easy to operate and actually makes the pistol quite safe with a round in the tube.

So again, I am more than likely one of the few here whom it bothers, but just figured if I'd post it and see if there are any other people who dislike it as well. :o
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Bothers me too. Helps to press using the inside of the first joint rather than the finger tip. That doesn't resolve the safety concern. Holster first then put in pocket or IWB especially with a soft helster. In this case my preference is for stiff shaped leather or kydex and OWB. I also don't love the grip of the G42 even though I can shoot it decently. When the opportunity presents I am going to try out an equivalent P365 to see if that's a better fit and trigger more to my liking.
 
Which is why i tend to prefer pistols with hammers over striker fired pistols. Just better triggers. And like above, the little "flippers" on many pistols really aren't any safety at all. Tug the trigger, the gun still shoots. Useless as an additional safety feature. Oh, my 365 has the manual safety, and I like it in my carry. So does my carry DW ECO. NV
 
The trigger dongle or whatever you want to call it doesn’t bother me in and of itself. It serves as a drop safety, redundant or not.

What bothers me is marketing it as a “safety”. If your booger hook or anything else gets inside the trigger guard, the gun will shoot. Try testing a Glock to make sure that thing works as intended. It takes some doing to depress the trigger itself without touching the “shoe”.

The Glock has a 1-1/2 action trigger in that it completes cocking the striker. 5.5 pounds is less than all but a race gun double action trigger pull but significantly more than most single actions. How do you advertise that? Why the extra “trigger safety” horse puckey is how!
 
FWIW, I've never really had an issue with the trigger safety per se, but I've only owned a couple pistols with it, and subsequently parted with them for unrelated reasons. When I bought my P365 about 6 years ago, I specifically got one without the manual safety because I'd carried DA revolvers for several years, then switched to a Kahr K9 prior to the Sig. None had a manual safety, and it just made sense to me.
 
I still don't get how some people get pinched by the trigger dingus.

The guys at Grand Power in Slovakia have an interesting take on the trigger safety. The safety dingus is sprung quite heavily compared to a Glock or M&P, but the actual trigger break is very light and crisp. Sounds like it shouldn't work, but it does.
 
I've tried; Lord knows I tried. I have owned a Glock 17, a 43, a 19 and a 45. Got rid of everyone of them, and I carry a round-butt 10-5 Snubby.
 
I have two Glocks. A 42 I bought for my wife and a 43 I bought from buddy who wanted a 365. I should have just sold the Glock and bought a 365. But it came with HD night sights, extra mags and Kramer leather. It’s not an EDC. I don’t shoot Glocks well. I hate the triggers.
 
I often question things that sometimes don't get much air time or maybe thought about often. Maybe because of my OCD, maybe because I always notice details and maybe just because most people go through life not being bothered by the same things that annoy me. :o

The center blade safeties on many of the new breed of carry gun triggers just bother's me - one of the reasons is because they tend to pinch my finger when pulling the trigger sometimes, maybe because they can potentially get jammed by a piece of debris but most of all because to me they are essentially a useless piece on the trigger that gives you nothing more than a false sense of safety and security!!

If you inadvertently have your finger on the trigger while reholstering, unholstering , etc. and the gun gets caught or pushed forward it will STILL go bang! As a drop safety I see no real reason for it as all the modern designs have drop safeties built into them. If the trigger gets caught on something and gets a strong enough force applied to pull it, it will pull the center blade safety anyway. So the REAL point of it is...... ???? More than likely, just a feel - good, do - nothing lawyer devise for law suits or anti law suits.

And...... that is one of the major reasons I so much prefer the Sig P365 over many of the clones by other manufacturer's - it has NO center trigger blade. It has an internal drop safety and they offer the P365 with and without a manual safety. I carried mine for 3 years without the manual safety feature and then added one - they came ready for installation even in the beginning of production. To me that is a REAL safety that is efficient, easy to operate and actually makes the pistol quite safe with a round in the tube.

So again, I am more than likely one of the few here whom it bothers, but just figured if I'd post it and see if there are any other people who dislike it as well. :o

Same here......I won't own a pistol with a "dingus" in the trigger.
 
I don't care to own a striker fired gun but the funky gizmo in the middle of the trigger apparently bothers very few shooters, especially those new to the game that have had little or no experience with a different, perhaps better trigger.
 
It doesn't bother me. I generally don't like striker fired pistols for carry, although I own a few striker fired pistols. My experience with the pinch has been with certain pistols like the Taurus G3C I had. My G17, Ruger EC9s and Beretta Nano don't do that to me, but the G3C did if I wasn't careful.
 
Back
Top