My failing memory - gun turrets on a sinking ship
I was in the Army, and my first exposure to the US Navy and some of its unique ways and traditions came when I attended EOD school, which is run by the Navy for all services. During my last assignment before I retired in 1986, I was in charge of a training division of an Army school that included Army, Navy Air Force and Marine students and staff. The senior Navy man present was a Warrant Officer Grade 4, who was informally addressed as Gunner. At that time, EOD was not a rating in the Navy, so all personnel carried their original rating in spite of being assigned full time to EOD duties and being SCUBA qualified divers. That meant that for promotion, they had to be tested in a rating that they had not worked in for years. Graduation certificates had the name and rank abbreviation on them, such as BM3, GM4 or whatever. I could decipher the older abbreviations as they were pretty clear, but some of the newer rating abbreviations were beyond me, so I went to the Gunner for assistance in interpreting them, but he couldn't help either, so we had the certificates changed to just show the rank without the rating. One of the Navy guys had previously been stationed with the EOD unit at Pearl Harbor, and one of their duties was diving on the wrecks remaining from WWII, including the USS Arizona to remove explosive items that are found. He had technical drawings on his office wall showing the Arizona as it sits today. They were interesting as they show that the gun turrets are missing, as well as the bridge superstructure and the damage inflicted that sank her..
Gun turrets missing? I forgot what I once read on that issue. Whether it was the explosion inside the ship or the tilting of the ship as it sinks?
The Japanese did a lot of planning and developing new weapons for the attack on Pearl. I have forgotten how many aircraft carriers (the new rulers of the sea then) were used against Pearl Harbor and how many hundred airplanes.
I was curious about the new armor piercing bombs they developed to penetrate our ships armored decks. And their use of miniature submarines for that attack.
It is possible I suppose, that the explosions inside the ship from the armor piercing bombs blew off the gun turrets?
It really bothered me whenever I later read the apologists claim we were the bad guys for using the atom bomb. We were trying to play catch-up and finally got ahead.
My favorite (garbage-lie) story was one claiming a radarman at pearl had seen the airplanes coming and warned the officers who were at a party and ignored it. Really silly when you read that we had to bomb enemy in the daytime because radar was not perfected until late in the war. Having radar meant you could bomb industrial cities at night. At one time it was a big deal for everyone to turn off their house lights so pilots could not find your city. After radar darkening a city was getting moot.
Early in WWII being a bomber crew was really dangerous, and submarine duty the safest.
I have also mostly forgotten the vacuum tube that made radar possible. Klystron Tube perhaps? I need to look it up. It was very top secret effort between our scientists and the English scientists. If I recall the tube had horseshoe like cutouts around the tube to get high energy into very small waves (or however described).
(Here we are)
Radar Basics - Klystron Amplifier
At one time I would joke that Henry Ford won WWII, and maybe WWI by inventing the powered assembly-line long before. But the engineers and code breakers played a big role. Everyone doing their best work at all levels made it happen.
And the very friendly boatswains mates I have worked with, and for, at times were probably well adjusted from all that fresh air and sunshine they get. They actually get to see the ocean as you cross it. (They would tell us lies about the lead seaman boatswain being the toughest, and anyone that could whip him became the new leader) (They obviously spent to much time around the marines who were out doing pushups on deck, or jogging around the deck).