Need help identifying my first S&W top break 38

Joined
Jul 26, 2024
Messages
2
Reaction score
3
I just purchased this nice 38 da top break S&W. This is my first S&W top break although i have several other model, H&R, IJ, all are nice. Not worried about value, only year and model number. Ser# is 253962 and is on frame butt, cylinder, and barrel latch. Any help appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1563.jpg
    IMG_1563.jpg
    126.9 KB · Views: 44
  • IMG_1562.jpg
    IMG_1562.jpg
    119.5 KB · Views: 39
  • IMG_1582.jpg
    IMG_1582.jpg
    103.7 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_1573.jpg
    IMG_1573.jpg
    128.3 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG_1570.jpg
    IMG_1570.jpg
    95.5 KB · Views: 27
Register to hide this ad
Hi There,

Welcome to The Group!

What you have is a S&W .38 DA Third Model. These were
made between 1884 and 1895. The third model started at
serial number 119001 and ended at 322700.


Cheers!
Webb
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your time. Would it be smokeless or BP or with today's loads does it matter?
DL
 
Thank you for your time. Would it be smokeless or BP or with today's loads does it matter?
DL

As built, this was intended for black powder ammunition. Smokeless didn't become approved by S&W until some years later. US factory ammo in these older calibers has been loaded to very mild specs for years, largely due to the existence of so many older BP era guns and the fact that many people simply used whatever ammunition was available to them.

There have been endless discussions on the use of smokeless in BP era guns on this forum. Many people use smokeless loads without any noticeable issues but the arguments about increased wear and tear, parts failures, etc. can be entertaining to say the least. If you want to stick to what the gun was designed for use black powder loads and be sure to clean properly when done.
 
Hi There,


As built, this was intended for black powder ammunition. Smokeless didn't become approved by S&W until some years later. US factory ammo in these older calibers has been loaded to very mild specs for years, largely due to the existence of so many older BP era guns and the fact that many people simply used whatever ammunition was available to them.

There have been endless discussions on the use of smokeless in BP era guns on this forum. Many people use smokeless loads without any noticeable issues but the arguments about increased wear and tear, parts failures, etc. can be entertaining to say the least. If you want to stick to what the gun was designed for use black powder loads and be sure to clean properly when done.


I learned that in later years of the production of the Colt 1877
DA (a.k.a. Lightning, Thunderer or Rainmaker), the boxes they
came in had printed on them "NOT ADAPTED FOR SMOKELESS
POWDER."

Just something to think about.


Cheers!
Webb
 
Last edited:
Back
Top