New Python vs 627PC

[Darkenfast]

I've been enjoying the Python vs 686 thread, but thought of a different comparison to ask for comments on. It looks like the price of a Python is roughly the same as a 627PC 8-shot moonclip-capable revolver.

What say ye all? Given the choice of a new Python in either four or six inch persuasion or a 627PC with a five-inch barrel, which is more desirable out-of-the-box, either from a shooting or value-for-money perspective?

I suppose this is the new equivalent of the old blued Python versus the Model 27 discussion!

 

[Texjack]

If price is the same new, I would expect the future value to be the same. I shot a friends new Python, not very impressed with the trigger. Shootability goes to the Smith, for sure. I would also prefer a 686 over a Python. Just my opinion, the people on the Colt forum may call me an idiot.

 

[swagmeister]

I would go with the Smith. A Python is nice but way overpriced, especially the nice vintage ones. The Smiths action is much better. I've had several Pythons in the past and could never get used to the stack in double action shooting. I also couldn't hit accurately in double action. The single action was great but the double action left a lot to be desired.

 

[Jason Demond]

The 627 is hands down the winner.

The 5" barrel just balances so well. The two extra shots are weird and off putting at first, but 8 beats 6 any day of the week. The gold bead pat front sight is superior to the tiny red/orange ramp sight of the Python, the rear is as well.

The action of most N frames are smooth and the 627 is no slouch in that regards.

 

[luvsmiths]

The New Pythons are Pythons in name only.

Take the 627.

Same as other thread, with different Smith model.

Maybe a third thread will be the charm....

 

[Jason Demond]

The New Pythons are Pythons in name only.

Take the 627.

Same as other thread, with different Smith model.

Maybe a third thread will be the charm....

To be fair...

The same could be said for S&W as well. It's the reason why we're paying through the nose for classic real Smiths.

 

[BigBill]

My older new colt python 6”/357 was a tac driver at 100yds with my 140 gr JHP reloads if I do my part. I wasn’t into s&w m27/m28 back then. My python had a Fort Knox lock up when the trigger was pulled. Does the mean anything I’m not sure I seen looser lock ups shoot accurately too.
Someday I’ll take the s&w m27/m28 out to compare them.

 

[colt_saa]

Much like the answer to the question if MS Word or WordPerfect is the better program, or if Ford or Chevy is the better PickUp, for the most part folks prefer the one that they got used to first.

With Firearms, the second one is different. On one you push to do sometrhing on the other you pull, or one rotates clock wise while another rotates counter clockwise. the first one was always easier.

Smith & Wessons, Colts and Dan Wessons are all great revolvers.

 

[AJ]

I have had an original Python in bright stainless with a six inch barrel. While it shot well, the thought it was to muzzle heavy for my tastes. I have a couple of N frame Smith's that have six inch barrels and they do not feel muzzle heavy to me. However, I must confess that my 3.5 inch M27-2 is my favorite.

 

[ultratec00]

It's almost an apples to oranges comparison. Two different frame sizes. Now if the anaconda had a comparable offering, that would be more apples to apples. The 27 and 28 have been around for a long time. Some would say a 357 in an N frame is a bit of an overkill. However, add two extra rounds, and there seems to be a niche much like a 7 shot 686+, which wouldn't be possible w/ a K frame 357.

 

[luvsmiths]

To be fair...

The same could be said for S&W as well. It's the reason why we're paying through the nose for classic real Smiths.

Point taken- you're right!

 

[sodacan]

I don't compare them. I just shoot and enjoy them. My no dash 686 is a great gun. My 1972 Python is a great gun. My 1954 Highway Patrolman is a great gun. My 1953, 357 Magnum is a great gun. My 1954 Colt 357 is a great gun. Need I go on. Every gun has its own character. Shoot what you like and like what you shoot.

 

[sigp220.45]

Definitely the new Python.

 

[Neversink n Klapperthal]

I dont care for the grip frame of the Python. It makes a muzzle heavy gun even more so. So I`m biased from the get go. Lol

 

[AJ]

I dont care for the grip frame of the Python. It makes a muzzle heavy gun even more so. So I`m biased from the get go. Lol

Felt the same about the Python that I had years ago.

 

[shocker]

Honestly, for 6 shot capacity, gimme a K-frame. 66-8, I'll have the factory do an action job, and still come out many hundreds of dollars ahead.

 

[chief38]

If the S&W 686 is a vintage model without all the new undesirable (IMO) features, I'd go with the Smith. If it's a brand new version of the 686 then I'd go with the Colt.

 

[HorizontalMike]

686 x 2

If the S&W 686 is a vintage model without all the new undesirable (IMO) features, I'd go with the Smith. If it's a brand new version of the 686 then I'd go with the Colt.

Absolutely! I loved my bought new 4" 686ND so much, I bought another 4" 686ND a couple of years ago. Can't argue with success!

Oh yeah, also bought my 2.625" 627PC a few years back as well. And truth be told all three (loaded) weigh within less than 0.6oz of each other. The 627PC is the lightest, yet all have a very similar recoil and action.

 

[dogdoc]

I own both and generally are a Smith guy but python wins this one. I like the new version better than my old python

 

[gumpys]

I handled one of the new pythons the other day. Hard pass. Go for the 627 all day long.

Eric

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk