New revolvers with the locks deleted and plugged

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rolandag2

Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2015
Messages
139
Reaction score
198
lock plugs made from stainless stock

df2b5f16c671b51c7d7132d10f1f0672.jpg
 
Register to hide this ad
Arrow are there you just can't see them in picture but faint in both guns
 
I'm not sure I understand.
Are they coming from the factory that way? That would suggest I could buy the plug from S&W and remove the lock stuff myself.
Or are they aftermarket? In which case, gimme the name/addy!
 
Do they just kinda sit in there or do they snap in somehow?
 
Your plugs look great, but that particular snubby is made in factory no lock. Why didn't you just get one of those?
 
Locks

I have a 986 with a lock, and I have never had any problem with it. Why is anyone wanting to remove them?
 
The plugs have a groove cut around their circumference and are locked in place with a stainless hairpin clip or the S&W lock spring and fork clip. There are photos in the link I posted above...

BTW, I'm not associated with Mr. Jennings in any way...just a satisfied customer. The plugs are made to fit just right. If you wish to remove your internal lock, this plug offers a really clean solution to filling the hole left in your piece. If you're happy with the internal lock in your gun, please disregard my post.
 
Last edited:
I have gotten used to the lock so I hardly even notice them but I sure would not mind plugging them. Never had a problem with them in any way either. The lock sure does not look like the S&W of 30 years ago but I don't look the same either.
 
lock plugs made from stainless stock

df2b5f16c671b51c7d7132d10f1f0672.jpg

They look very nice, and well done! I am going to get criticized, but they are I.L. guns, even with the locks removed. I have only 2 w/ locks. 25-15, and 625JM. For what I use them for, locks not hurting a thing. Bob By the way, welcome to the FORUM!
 
I keep my firearms in a safe, so the lock is redundant in my case. My lock never failed, but I did have someone bring me a loaded and locked 638 with the hammer back, once. That didn't seem like a very safe condition, at all. The time honored DA revolver manual-of-arms still works very well for me, thank you.
 
I have a 986 with a lock, and I have never had any problem with it. Why is anyone wanting to remove them?
Some people don't like the look. Some don't like the fact that S&W gave in to the Clinton administration back when these were put in place. And some don't like it for practical reasons. Generally the more mechanical things you add and the more complex it is the higher the chance of failure. There have been people who had mechanical issues with the lock. It's happened when the lock froze during shooting rendering the gun useless.

I'm indifferent to them but given the choice I'll buy one without. I don't want added safeties as an afterthought
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top