Next step in Peruta (California CCW case)

[Kentucky Dave]

The State of California (in the person of the Attorney General) and the Brady Bunch submitted their replies to Peruta's Response to their Motions to Intervene filed last month in the Ninth Circuit.

No biggie in the State's reply in that Peruta has already said the State may intervene unopposed (generally speaking).

It will be interesting to hear the Court's comments on one aspect of the State's intervention pleading.

It will be very interesting to hear the Court's ruling on the reply by the Brady Bunch.

Here is the link that the Ninth Circuit has posted for following Peruta.

Edward Peruta v County of San Diego

 

[Kentucky Dave]

New Order in Peruta May 1, 2014

Appellee William D. Gore is ordered to notify this Court in writing within fourteen days of the date of this order of his position on the pending motions to intervene or that he takes no position.

Appellee William D. Gore is further ordered to respond within fourteen days of the date of this order to the suggestion that this case is moot.

See Opp’n to Pet. for Reh’g En Banc 16, Richards v. Prieto, No. 11-16255 (“Even were Peruta vacated tomorrow, neither this Court nor the state could do anything to keep Gore from printing permits to all otherwise-qualified comers. The Peruta dispute is moot.”). He shall explain any change in his policy that could affect this Court’s jurisdiction over this case.

Case: 10-56971 05/01/20