That's where our homes are different - It's not possible to "stumble into my house", so I don't concern myself with that.
Even if he drove in the front door with an MRAP, I'm cool with letting the guy live if I can help it. Whatever the dude feels like grabbing.
Like Jules said--"Know what I'm buying, Ringo? Your life."
Make out to harm me or mine, however, deal's off.
handejector said:
Well, gee, that's a good question.
Maybe the target is the guy in a dark parking lot that says "Gimme your wallet now!".....
Maybe it is the guy that kicked in my front door at 3am and is coming down the hall....
Maybe it is the guy breaking my car window on my locked car in the driveway as I walk outside tonight.....
Maybe it is the guy down the hill at my barn that I hear beating on the padlock.......
The first two, I'm still required to verify that the dude's a lethal threat. Around here, "Gimme your wallet!" ain't gonna hold a ton of water. Maybe if I light him up, I'll learn some stuff that keeps my finger off the trigger. Either way, I'd feel a lot better about my prospects for not being in jail if I can see who I'm shooting.
And besides--I'd really prefer to not shoot if I can help it. Even if I'm legally-justified. Even if the guy deserves it. I think it's the moral choice, and I think it's infinitely more convenient. YMMV.
The latter two, I'm gonna walk away and call the 5-0. Although I don't have livestock, so I've never examined that. I think in my county, you'd probably get acquitted for shooting a guy trying to burn down your horse barn.
But hey, we can sit here all day and invent situations. How do I indicate I'm not being disparaging or sarcastic?

Pretty much anything you can think of, somebody can think of a situation to justify it. It gets us nowhere, just arguing.
"If you can't see your sights, how are you IDing your target?" is a rhetorical question. I agree--you can't shoot with miserable sights. Good sights are...good. I also think that having a flashlight is a good tool that does a lot of things, and thinking hard before you use lethal force is also good.
If I am ever outside in a bad situation at night again, I really hope the other guy turns on a flashlight. It won't be me providing the aiming point.
If I find myself in the middle of a situation where people are shooting at light sources, I have made some awfully poor life choices and run afoul of the wrong folk.
And yes, I'm being facetious, I realize those comments are very frequently made in reference to or based upon military/LEO service. Which is precisely my point--I'm not over there, I'm back here. I know where there are some guys, over here on this side of the Atlantic, that would probably shoot at lights, so I'm not going to go to the places where they are.
IAHunter said:
It is fairly common for officers to shoot more accurately on night quals because they are paying closer attention to their night sights and can't see the target very well. If you pay closer attention to your sights (particularly the front sight) on day quals you will improve your accuracy. I saw this play out as an instructor on the range many times.
Every single friggin' time with me, it's start-stop-start on the trigger. One day I figured out how to just pull straight through, and suddenly got good at shooting. Periodically I revert, because I start caring about scores, or lose faith in myself. But it's all mental management. If I trained/practiced more, I bet I wouldn't.
Then I realized that most people I know were still shooting with interrupted trigger pulls, because they thought that that was how you were supposed to work the trigger, and my mind was literally blown.