mkk41
US Veteran
Seems to be the newest crusade. Iowa is issuing permits to SOME people who are considered legally , but not 100% totally blind. Of course , it's being blown out of proportion on the talk/news shows. Like a certain CNN blankity-blank-blank crowing that he doesn't want ''people blind as bat having an AR-15 assault rifle"!
Should a person deemed legally blind , but only has limited vision be denied their 2nd Amendment rights?
That would mark them as defenseless and an easy victim!
I know a few people who , due to injury , age or other reasons , are considered legally blind because they cannot pass a drivers eye exam , but can see enough at 10-20ft that they can tell a threat and hit a person at arms length to social distance.

Should a person deemed legally blind , but only has limited vision be denied their 2nd Amendment rights?
That would mark them as defenseless and an easy victim!
I know a few people who , due to injury , age or other reasons , are considered legally blind because they cannot pass a drivers eye exam , but can see enough at 10-20ft that they can tell a threat and hit a person at arms length to social distance.