No more Bullseye! What are you switching to?

[Oil Field Trash]

I was the GM of a startup ammo company in 2019. We bought components in bulk (while there was availability) including kegs of powder
. By mid 2020, components dried up and prices went off the chart.
We shut it down, couldn’t compete with the big names.
We split the remaining inventory between the partners and I ended up with the keg of 231.

 

['79 Magnum GT]

I was the GM of a startup ammo company in 2019. We bought components in bulk (while there was availability) including kegs of powder
. By mid 2020, components dried up and prices went off the chart.
We shut it down, couldn’t compete with the big names.
We split the remaining inventory between the partners and I ended up with the keg of 231.

How big was the keg, 8lbs?

Rick

 

[Oil Field Trash]

How big was the keg, 8lbs?

Rick

75 lbs , it was a barrel actually

 

['79 Magnum GT]

75 lbs , it was a barrel actually

I had no idea! Was that for shipping and then repackaging into smaller containers later? I'm intrigued.

Rick

 

[Marcruger]

The OP's question is an easy one. Bullseye is just about directly replaced by TiteGroup. In fact, I jokingly call it "Improved Bullseye". I had settled on switching to TiteGroup before Bullseye disappeared. TiteGroup uses nearly the same powder charge, and gives the same range of velocities. It is not position sensitive and turns in excellent Extreme Spread (ES) and Standard Deviation (SD) numbers. I find it to be very accurate. It is commonly available still. For some weird reason internet and YouTube "experts" want to hate TiteGroup. Especially the part about the small volume of powder per charge, and calling it "dangerous". People have been loading that volume of Bullseye for years, and I've never heard that being an issue. You just have to be cautious, methodical, and check each case with a flashlight. I do that for ANY powder charge in any case. Just common safety sense.

 

[muzzlestuffer2012]

The OP's question is an easy one. Bullseye is just about directly replaced by TiteGroup. In fact, I jokingly call it "Improved Bullseye". I had settled on switching to TiteGroup before Bullseye disappeared. TiteGroup uses nearly the same powder charge, and gives the same range of velocities. It is not position sensitive and turns in excellent Extreme Spread (ES) and Standard Deviation (SD) numbers. I find it to be very accurate. It is commonly available still. For some weird reason internet and YouTube "experts" want to hate TiteGroup. Especially the part about the small volume of powder per charge, and calling it "dangerous". People have been loading that volume of Bullseye for years, and I've never heard that being an issue. You just have to be cautious, methodical, and check each case with a flashlight. I do that for ANY powder charge in any case. Just common safety sense.

Iv'e heard good things about TiteGroup but haven't tried it yet I have so MUCH Bullseye and N310 I haven't needed to try it. Is it a dirty powder compared to the others ?
Thanks

 

[rockquarry]

Iv'e heard good things about TiteGroup but haven't tried it yet I have so MUCH Bullseye and N310 I haven't needed to try it. Is it a dirty powder compared to the others ?
Thanks

I use Titegroup. No dirtier than anything else. I've used many powders but don't know that I'd call any of them clean.