One of our idiots

jlrhiner

US Veteran
Joined
Oct 13, 2005
Messages
4,819
Reaction score
6,596
Location
Arnold, Missouri
has proposed that firearms owners should notify their local school districts if they own firearms.:eek:

Missouri SB 124.

Authored by Maria Chappelle-Nadal from University City, MO.
 
Register to hide this ad
I read this earlier somewhere else, do you think it really has a chance of going anywhere?
 
No, I don't think it stands a snowballs chance in ......., well, you know. But she's going to get to go on CNN and tell everybody about it. And she really thinks this is the "big" solution.
 
Dear school District, I will home school my children from this date forward.

You would then have to notify yourself that you have weapons.:D:D

What's next? My child has a cavity, I have to register their toothpaste with the local police dept. for future confiscation.
 
Somebody needs to get that woman on the news to explain her thinking. I could use a good laugh. What a moron...

I would generally like to have each of these morons have to go on TV and defend their ideas against an academic panel like a Master's Thesis. I'd love to hear their rational, detailed analysis, scientific basis, statistical abstract, and carefully supported plan.

That would be a laugh to watch them have no facts, no stats, nothing but hot air.
 
I heard about that. What's the logic? If a childs parent owns a gun, will they kick him out of school? Will they send stormtroopers to the childs home and seize all their guns? It's just so amazingly idiotic.
 
Last edited:
has proposed that firearms owners should notify their local school districts if they own firearms.:eek:

Missouri SB 124.

Authored by Maria Chappelle-Nadal from University City, MO.

WHY? Please tell me why! What on earth could be the rationale for such a mindless requirement?
 
WHY? Please tell me why! What on earth could be the rationale for such a mindless requirement?

So far, I don't believe logic was involved. She included that in other measures, (mandatory security requirements, along with penalties if your weapon is stolen and used in a crime) That solves the whole "problem".
 
So far, I don't believe logic was involved. She included that in other measures, (mandatory security requirements, along with penalties if your weapon is stolen and used in a crime) That solves the whole "problem".

:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
 
In reading these threads I'm reminded of a time before I retired from LE. The school board wanted cops in the high schools in my city and I was sent to the initial meetings to represent the chief of police. What they wanted was a cop, but without a gun, in the schools. I said that was a deal breaker, I would never put an officer in any situation where they were not armed, and promptly left the meeting. Eventually we did put cops in the high schools, but the chief backed me and they were armed.

It never ceases to amaze me how utterly naive some people are, and I'm glad to be retired.
 
Back
Top