Bob R
US Veteran
ETA: Do you have any idea why the people in CA are proponents of open carry?
I don't know where the destructiveness part comes into play in that article.
It is a CA problem, in WA where open carry is legal and much more accepted Starbucks has said:
In fact that should cover their stores in all states, not just CA and where this article came from, which is a small enclave of thinkers much like those in CA up in the Pacific Northwest.
Sounds like Starbucks is not bowing to the pressure of the Brady people to me.
That makes it a check in the win column for me.
bob
I don't know where the destructiveness part comes into play in that article.
It is a CA problem, in WA where open carry is legal and much more accepted Starbucks has said:
Starbucks has responded only with a written statement saying, "The safety of our customers and partners is a paramount concern. We have existing security protocols in place to handle situations related to safety in our stores. We will continue to adhere closely to local, state and federal laws and the counsel of law enforcement regarding this issue."
In fact that should cover their stores in all states, not just CA and where this article came from, which is a small enclave of thinkers much like those in CA up in the Pacific Northwest.
Sounds like Starbucks is not bowing to the pressure of the Brady people to me.
That makes it a check in the win column for me.
bob
Last edited: