My (post-war) Outdoorsman (S93429, shipped April 14, 1953, and in top condition (with no "Cokes) sold during the liquidation of my collection during the last three years ending a year or so ago for $1625.
Ralph Tremaine
Ralph Tremaine
Many thanks to all of you who posted comments and information. Concerning the "coke bottle" stocks, kudos to you sharp-eyed experts who recognized them immediately. I did read about them in Hoosier45's informative N-stock post from 2018, but didn't occur to me they might have been retrofitted to my gun. Also, I did check for chamber reaming, and a 357 mag round does not chamber fully (chamber depth is ~30 mm and rim-to-face gap is ~2-3 mm), so it seems to be unmolested. Value estimates are in the range I expected, but I'm on the fence about keeping or selling. I'm getting up there (84 in November) and my heirs have no interest in firearms, so I'm leaning toward selling.
DallasMac wrote: Value estimates are in the range I expected, but I'm on the fence about keeping or selling. I'm getting up there (84 in November) and my heirs have no interest in firearms, so I'm leaning toward selling.
Is it missing the roll mark here, or is it just because I'm looking at it on my phone ?![]()
Sent from my SM-G781U1 using Tapatalk
Hey Jeff how about some more pictures? And congrats on your acquisition.
Thank you Jeff for the photos and information. I asked about the barrel
because one of the two RM barreled Outdoorsman I have has a serial number just five off from yours.
I know of nine examples that have the RM barrels and would love to hear from anyone that has one.
Jerry
Sorry for the very old photo.
In reference to the length difference, I have measured near a dozen and a half sets and the largest difference observed was .042. The majority were between.032 and .038. Would love to have a transition Outdoorsman someday. Very cool guns in this thread.