truckemup97
Member
Why do you need marksmanship skills, when newer guns will hold more rounds??![]()
Good point. You can get a 30 round magazine for the Glock.

Why do you need marksmanship skills, when newer guns will hold more rounds??![]()
Good point. You can get a 30 round magazine for the Glock.![]()
-the article states that "many soldiers reengage the decoking lever when raking the slide"....yeah, that is what training is for: you find a deficiency and train a workable solution...sorry there I go again..../QUOTE]
Well, if a decocking DA/SA without a manual safety is already good enough (Sig 228/M11), how 'bout we just go to a 92G slide? Problem solved mechanically, 'cause sometimes you just can't train some folks.... I've tried too many times![]()
Novalty: What's that thing sticking out of the back of the Glock's slide? Photoshop?
Novalty: What's that thing sticking out of the back of the Glock's slide? Photoshop?
-the article states that "many soldiers reengage the decoking lever when raking the slide"....yeah, that is what training is for: you find a deficiency and train a workable solution...sorry there I go again..../QUOTE]
Well, if a decocking DA/SA without a manual safety is already good enough (Sig 228/M11), how 'bout we just go to a 92G slide? Problem solved mechanically, 'cause sometimes you just can't train some folks.... I've tried too many times![]()
LOL...well that is very true....but I also believe that whether in a war zone or here at home: SOME PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE ARMED![]()
As for US manf, the 229 is half built in the US.
Aren't they all built in New Haven now?
Nope. Grip size is Glock's biggest problem, IMO. And some men and almost all women have smaller hands than I do.Just off the top of my head, the answer is simple. If the focus is a manageable grip size, capacity, power, etc., they need to pick the .40 S&W and issue the Glock 22.
The 1911 will fit almost anybody, and very few folks complain that the caliber is too small. Anyone who can't design a gun that fits most folks' hands (like the 1911 already does) should find some other line of work."USA made weapons period." I'd go one step further. U.S. made weapons chambered in the most effective caliber possible regardless of if it suits nato, now, etc. If someone doesn't have a large enough hand to handle the grip, let them adapt. But use a weapon in a caliber that will get the job done and not try to come up with some design that will satisfy a small group, etc.
I can't believe this thread has gone this far and nobody has said go back to the 1911 .45. They should be able to get them cheap, since every gun company makes them now.
Why don't we stick with what we've already paid for and spend a little more time on marksmanship skills?
Way to much brass overhead also. Isn't the M9 built in Md? Wouldn't Beretta lay off those workers?