Proper jargon - is a model 14 a K38?

Maybe I'm wrong, but a M15 even six inched, will have a Baughman front sight. For this reason it will be a M15 again. The scarce M14 4" barreled had a Patridge foresight, and for this reason it wasn't a M15.....

Yes you are wrong. But I don't think S&W made many of these so easy mistake to make. There were also some 15-5 six inch guns and some 8 3/8s too although I've never seen one. Here's an example of a 15-6 six inch with Patridge front sight; sure looks like a K38 to me.

Jeff
SWCA #1457
 

Attachments

  • 15-6 6 inch 38 Spec.jpg
    15-6 6 inch 38 Spec.jpg
    38.8 KB · Views: 54
  • 15-6 6 inch BNW7268 1993.jpg
    15-6 6 inch BNW7268 1993.jpg
    29.5 KB · Views: 42
Last edited:
.....what you call this thing, but I sure like it!

1957 Illinois State Police Contract, 5 inch barrel, .38 Special.

Roy Jinks called it a “Neat Gun” when I asked for a ship date on my 5”. By the serial number search from another forum member mine is NOT an ISP like yours, wish it was, by all accounts you have a nice and pretty rare gun there, Neat!
 
Ok, but what do you call it if it is what you say except that it has an 8 3/8 inch barrel? Or is stamped 15-6 and has a six inch barrel? And does it really matter to anyone outside of our somewhat eccentric group?

Jeff
SWCA #1457

Note the word I used was "expect" not "demand." Folks get to call all sorts of things K-38s if it suits them, but IMHO, the term brings to mind the classic Masterpiece which was the premier Bullseye Revolver of the S&W line for decades. If the image fades in my memory, I open my gun box and look at my 1948 vintage narrow rib example nestled in with its smaller brother the K-22 and its much younger sister the Model 16-3 copy I had to have built to fill the slot. :cool:

Froggie
 
One of our colleagues noted he was not a purist----and that's all well and good. I'm pretty sure nothing's chiseled in stone anywhere about what we're supposed to call any particular handgun-----other than in my mind, of course.

The first model number I ever saw was 19. It was on the box of this shiny new gun I was about to buy. It was in small print. Right up above it, in BIG print, it said COMBAT MAGNUM. That's what I was going to buy. I suspect, had all it said was Model 19---no matter in what size print----I suspect I'd probably have bought a PYTHON------has a certain ring to it---kinda like COMBAT MAGNUM.

Well, I bought it, took it home, and put it on the shelf. I told folks it was a COMBAT MAGNUM. They said it was a pretty neat gun.

It wasn't too long after that, that I heard folks talking about Model 19's, and Model this, and Model that. I thought about that some, and decided it was sad they didn't know what the names of these guns were.

Then----then pretty much everything went straight to Hell in a handbasket!! Folks started calling the early guns like a COMBAT MAGNUM---started calling them "Pre-Model 19's---and Pre Model this---and Pre Model that. More often than not I didn't know what they were talking about----had to look it up.

Then I got mad, not because I had to look stuff up; but because these "Pre-Model" this and that folks didn't seem to care enough to learn and use the proper names.

I'm still mad. I guess that makes me one of those purists.

(Oh, and by the way, a K-38 is a K frame .38 Special Target gun with a 6" barrel. Another K frame .38 Special target grade gun with a 4" barrel is a Combat Masterpiece. It's actually alright with me some folks either don't know that or don't care. The folks who don't know can find out easy enough, and as far as the folks who don't care go, well that's just sad.)

Ralph Tremaine

I see Lee beat me to it with this K-38 and Combat Masterpiece business. Good on you, Sir!


Far be it from me to argue with you or Lee, not gonna happen in this lifetime, maybe I’ll be smarter in the next, nah, not likely.

I’m confused with the naming too, and my letters didn’t help, but then perhaps Roy is using common language that most have come to accept, since he notes the designation for each in my 3 letters on the K22, K32, and K38 and mentioned the Combats using the K22/32/38 Combat Masterpiece and model numbers. Sent for letters on the Combats but that’s a while out.

I’ve put together the K22, 32, and 38 Masterpieces, and very recently picked up what I thought were the K22 Combat Masterpiece (18-3), a K38 Combat Masterpiece (4” Pre-15), and a K38 Combat Masterpiece (5” Pre-14). Likely no chance I’ll ever get a K32 Combat.

So to be clear, they are:

22 Combat Masterpiece 18-3
38 Combat Masterpiece (Pre-14 4”)
38 Combat Masterpiece (Pre-15 5”))
 

Attachments

  • 265C50A2-CED0-41DD-AC30-74BC1160A26B.jpg
    265C50A2-CED0-41DD-AC30-74BC1160A26B.jpg
    58.7 KB · Views: 16
  • A4E37AE2-523F-4A32-90EB-D57082354FB0.jpg
    A4E37AE2-523F-4A32-90EB-D57082354FB0.jpg
    83 KB · Views: 22
Last edited:
Ok, but what do you call it if it is what you say except that it has an 8 3/8 inch barrel? Or is stamped 15-6 and has a six inch barrel? And does it really matter to anyone outside of our somewhat eccentric group?

Jeff
SWCA #1457

I look at it this way, if I say to two people "what kinda car do you drive" and they both say "A Chevrolet Corvette " you assume they both have the same type of car....but if one says a 1978 L82 Corvette and the other replies a 2019 ZR1 Corvette you understand very quickly the two cars are completely different but share the same name and lineage.

To that point is a six inch 15-8 a K38 ?
Yes.... but its not a 1955 K38 Heavy Masterpiece.... and although they may look similar to the untrained eye and are made by the same company they have almost zero parts compatability.
 
Well, Jack gave us a pretty good example of a K-38 Masterpiece Model 14. Here's one of a K-22 Masterpiece Model 17.

It is a 17-4 with all original paperwork, box and tools that I ordered and purchased new in April of 1980. The folded up brochure in the pic has a revision date of 1978 printed on the back page.
 

Attachments

  • DSC01954b.jpg
    DSC01954b.jpg
    103 KB · Views: 30
Given the absolute disregard for proper terminology by most S&W owners ("pencil barrel" immediately comes to mind) I am surprised this discussion has drawn so much interest.

May I inject the I38?

standard.jpg
 
FWIW, I don’t get wrapped around the axle on Smith nomenclature. Generally speaking I use the names of guns or the term “pre”, e.g., pre 27 instead of 357 magnum, for guns made before model numbers and the model number for those made after 58.
 
I kinda don't like the "Pre-" because that didn't exist until they went to Model numbers. It's like .45 "Long" Colt. It didn't become "Long" until after the fact.

It also bugs me when the Dr. tells you your pre-diabetic. Hell, we're all "Pre-Diabetic".
 
Maybe I'm wrong, but a M15 even six inched, will have a Baughman front sight. For this reason it will be a M15 again. The scarce M14 4" barreled had a Patridge foresight, and for this reason it wasn't a M15.....

So then what do you call this one? Model 14 no dash, Baughman front sight, target hammer, trigger and stocks........... with a 5” heavy barrel? Factory lettered to have been shipped in that configuration.
Not being contentious, just having some fun with the S&W axiom, never say never with Smith!!





 
Last edited:
I kinda don't like the "Pre-" because that didn't exist until they went to Model numbers. It's like .45 "Long" Colt. It didn't become "Long" until after the fact.

It also bugs me when the Dr. tells you your pre-diabetic. Hell, we're all "Pre-Diabetic".

Getting into George Carlin "Select passengers are now invited to pre-board the aircraft" territory there...

It's obvious there are distinct differences between factory terminology, collector terminology, and 'street' terminology. But this is the case with any mature hobby or collector field.
 
When I was a kid in grade school, the school library had a neat book called, "All About Handguns", or something to that effect.
(I know...:eek:)
I used to check it out very regularly. (Quick, someone call the principal!). My younger brother and I used to gawk over the appendix which showed all the S&W revolvers one by one, with specs and prices. And, Names! Of course we learned them all, knew the ballistics of all the various chamberings, etc.
Later on, we got ahold of a genuine S&W catalog!! Then, we learned the model numbers, too. The dash this, dash that didn't bother us. Just seemed to be minor engineering changes to us kids.

Couple more years later, we kicked ourselves. One of the gunshow regulars was always trying to sell his old M29 for the same price as a new one (dash 3 by that point). Turns out it was a mint 4" four screw with nickel finish in presentation case. Kinda wish I gave him the 450 bucks...

Jim
 
Yes you are wrong. But I don't think S&W made many of these so easy mistake to make. There were also some 15-5 six inch guns and some 8 3/8s too although I've never seen one. Here's an example of a 15-6 six inch with Patridge front sight; sure looks like a K38 to me.

Jeff
SWCA #1457

Then I don't understand: apart the stamping M15 (or 14), if two guns have the identical frame, barrel, trigger&hammer, grips, cylinder, sights, finish, rib, backstrap & frontstrap, lockwork......which is the difference?
 
Given the absolute disregard for proper terminology by most S&W owners ("pencil barrel" immediately comes to mind) I am surprised this discussion has drawn so much interest.

May I inject the I38?

Agh, Gee thanks, as you had to remind me of the obvious hole in collection. I have no I frames :(
 
The best way to answer the question is to look at what the company was calling them from 1958 onward (that is the year model numbered guns actually started shipping to dealers).

Take a look at this picture of a Model 14-2 that shipped in 1967. The spec sheet that shipped with it, clearly seen in the picture, should answer your question.

OK, thanks everyone for replying. I am going to have go with Jack's (JP@AK) reply, with his photo evidence of the company literature as the best evidence that my personal definition is/was wrong and so I've learned something here!!
 
It's obvious there are distinct differences between factory terminology, collector terminology, and 'street' terminology. But this is the case with any mature hobby or collector field.

Indeed.

But folks should remember that the purpose of the terminology is to clearly identify the gun at hand to others. So coming up with your own “purist” usage rule is counterproductive if your interpretation is not shared by a majority of collectors and users out there, no matter how precise and well-reasoned your justification might be.

Just like the eternal infernal debate about the Models 1902 and 1905. Lee once provided a detailed and convincing explanation why collectors distinguish the Model 1902 from the later Model 1905 round-butt. It’s technical. But back at the time, neither the factory nor anyone else made the distinction, and the vast majority of users and historical collectors are better served by the simple butt-shape distinction (1902 = rd, 1905 = sq). That’s practical.

Same here. As Jack’s photo in post #4 proves conclusively, all three possibilities, K-38, Masterpiece, and Model 14, were in “official” use at that time, by 1967 about ten years into the model-number era. So we can discuss which name is more practical or why, but none is more “correct” than the others. And none is “wrong”.
 
I can tell you what I think...

I think words matter a whole lot. They are powerful and carry a lot of weight and those who are skilled with them are an asset to any group, hobby or culture.

When it comes to this particular group, most of us are well aware that S&W followed their own rules, rules that were and are ever changing. Rule #1 is the golden rule with S&W.

Where does that leave us? I think the best move is to listen to the most skilled voices, the folks around here that stand out for not only their deep knowledge base and experience, but their eloquence, clarity and willingness to share that knowledge and experience.

They don’t get to make the rules (don’t forget Rule #1) but in my opinion, their opinion carries more weight than many or even most.

If you can’t figure out who those folks are then you probably also aren’t the type who cares about the value of nomenclature and terminology.
 
Then I don't understand: apart the stamping M15 (or 14), if two guns have the identical frame, barrel, trigger&hammer, grips, cylinder, sights, finish, rib, backstrap & frontstrap, lockwork......which is the difference?

I think the "rest of the story" on the M14s/15s is that S&W discontinued the M14, (-4 version) in 1982 concurrent with the elimination of the pinned barrel. When the M14 was re-introduced in 1991 it was with a full lug barrel as the 14-5 (all of this according to the Standard Catalog).

The 15-5 with six inch barrel (and 8 3/8) came along in 1986 perhaps due to customer demand from the lack of a "traditional" M14? Just guessing, maybe someone here has better information. The 15-6 with six inch barrel continued until 1992. Perhaps a leap too far, someone here will surely let us know, but it appears to me that during this period the M15 in six inch became the only option to continue the K38 Masterpiece if you wanted something close to the original configuration. Or perhaps with the discontinuance of the M14-4 in 1982 that was the last of the "real" K38s and we should only use model numbers now. Frankly using model numbers for all those that have them, seems like the logical thing to do. Of course then we need to memorize the changes in the various dash numbers to adequately explain to another collector what we have.

Jeff
SWCA #1457
 
K Frame, in fact the first "hand ejector"
38 caliber
DA or SA...your choice
"bred" for Combat (US Army)
too early for Model 14
way too early for K38 Masterpiece
too early for even "pre 14"

Guess I'll just keep calling it a Smith & Wesson, or "neat old piece".

All above...…….very, very tongue in cheek folks.:D
I call it a very very pre-Model 10, or Military and Police.
 
1,356 angels can sit on the
point of a needle if you get
my point.

Bless the internet gun forums.

Or what else would we be doing?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top