Raccoon revived with Narcan after suspected fentanyl poisoning

...they could distinguish when you had a rifle.
Entering into a battle of wits with raccoons can be a losing proposition. Several years ago the city of Toronto had a massive raccoon population that outsmarted many attempts to control them. The then mayor, John Tory, foolishly made brave statements about getting on top of the problem, providing raccoon-proof containers, etc. HA!

There was a documentary, "Raccoon Nation", made about that time which followed the investigation into the extent of the raccoon population in Toronto. If it's still available, it's a good watch.
 
Years ago the local coons from the marsh were wrecking my bird feeders. Built a wide shelf around a tree that held one feeder with an opening as wide as aConABear trap. IIRC got 19 in about 2 weeks. ConABear kills instantly so no suffering. Living in town just used a PHD and dropped them head first in hole.
 
Couple of flakes but that's my opinion.
How did the vet figure fentanyl of all things?
Well, flaked out on the deck anyway.

From the full article (q.v.):
... he said they believe it was fentanyl due to the response to Narcan.

“There are other drugs that it could have gone into that they would also recover with stimulation, but we had an animal that went from really lethargic to wide awake after Narcan application,” Walton said...​
 
China, Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Philippines and Thailand execute people for drug possession.

They still have a drug problem, and people willing to smuggle drugs, at the risk of summary execution.

Interdiction alone doesn’t work. Demand needs to be addressed.

It is a by-product of greed. It also is used to fight and finance terrorism. I would bet hospitals have been built using drug money in some places around the world. Fentanyl is like a sharp, two-edged sword; it is used in the medical field for good, and for addiction and God knows what else on the streets.
 
Last edited:
China, Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Philippines and Thailand execute people for drug possession.

They still have a drug problem, and people willing to smuggle drugs, at the risk of summary execution.

Interdiction alone doesn’t work. Demand needs to be addressed.

Maybe, but those executed don't meet the definition of "repeat offenders."
 
Very Simple, shoot to kill any that attempt to bring the **** into our country.

Won't work. Making murder a capital crime never worked. The war on drugs has been a complete and total failure since its inception. Be better off spending money on trying to figure out why everyone wants to be high.
 
Won't work. Making murder a capital crime never worked. The war on drugs has been a complete and total failure since its inception. Be better off spending money on trying to figure out why everyone wants to be high.

No it would work just fine, no repeats. This country has gotten Way To Soft on crime. Century+ ago shooting criminals was SOP. Way to much tv, movies and now all the online garbage.
Those wanting to get high is just another open and obvious problem this country has as we have gone away from out founding beliefs. Not going to “preach “as might get in trouble.
 
China, Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Philippines and Thailand execute people for drug possession.

They still have a drug problem, and people willing to smuggle drugs, at the risk of summary execution.

Interdiction alone doesn’t work. Demand needs to be addressed.

I'd bet the percentage of those country's population that are executed for drug possession or dead from overdoses is a tiny percentage of how many die from overdoses or drug related crime in this country. If keeping the numbers of deaths connected with illegal drugs is the goal, we're doing it 180 degrees different than how we should be doing it.
 
Back when they had the death penalty and cops were seldom ever questioned about why they shot anyone, there was absolutely no shortage of crime. Ever hear of Bonnie and Clyde, Pretty Boy Floyd, Capone, and a host of others? The MOB loved prohibition. They made a killing off it and there was lots of violence and murder due to the money involved. Prohibition made something with little value very valuable.

What did we learn from this? Apparently nothing.

In the 60s there were actually very few drugs around. Yes, some pot was being smoked mostly Mexican ""dirt weed" and there were a few heroin junkies in the big cities. Then came the "War on Drugs". After 50+ years, the prisons are overflowing, Mexico along with lots of the rest of central and South America are war zones controlled by drug cartels. The pot is 10 times stronger, cocaine, heroin, meth and Fentanyl are available at every intersection in America, gangs control lots of the inner cities and their turf wars have bullets flying everywhere.

Why? Mostly because our government made a bunch of easy to produce stuff extremely valuable. A kilo of coke in Columbia is 4K and in the U it is worth 60 before being distributed to the end users. Heroin has similar values, Fentanyl sells wholesale for 4K a kilo but on the street it is worth $1500 a gram of pure. That is a mark up of 375 times before it is cut some more. A good chemist with a Meth lab is like printing money.

The thing all the distributors, all the way up and down the supply chain, want is money and more money and the way to get it is MORE CUSTOMERS

We have lost the war for over 50 years using all kinds of penalties. NEWS FLASH Keeping the same approach isn't going to turn it around. If you shoot 10 of them in the back of the head on the spot, they will just sent 100 on the next trip. Most of it isn't coming in in back packs anyway. Airplanes, ships, drones, subs, tunnels etc. Shut one down and 3 more pop up.
 
Wild raccoons are nasty little things. Darned few dogs will take one on without getting really messed up.

The other part: there is a reason that cops handcuff those to whom Narcan is going to be applied - they wake up really angry and fighting. Doing so after application is too late, but then they have to be transported to a hospital, as for many the dosage will stay in them after the Narcan wears off.
 
I think a lot more was going on before the war against drugs than dirt weed. A product made from leaves natives chewed to give them stamina at high altitudes in the mountains of South America was one problem.

The world, according to Maxwell Smart, fought between two entities: Control and Chaos. The guy had a phone in his shoe.
 
How many drug wards did the Peruvian tin miners have? While it was around n the 50s and 60s it wasn't anywhere near as prevalent until AFTER the "War on Drugs" began.

Want more of it, make it illegal. Want less, tax it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top