- Joined
- Dec 2, 2012
- Messages
- 3,345
- Reaction score
- 5,562
A handgun is used to fight to get your rifle.
I'm betting that there are even fewer instances of this occurring than a weapon being reloaded during a self-defense situation.
A handgun is used to fight to get your rifle.
Do you have millions of dollars saved up? Its better to have it and not need it than not have it and need it.
I'm betting that there are even fewer instances of this occurring than a weapon being reloaded during a self-defense situation.
Point being handguns are not very effective man stoppers if you still haven't neutralized a threat after emptying your side arm completely you better get to a rifle
No, I think you're reading into it. I don't believe those who carry extra are "judging" those who don't, at least I'm not.Those who carry extra judge others who dont.
Absolutely. Im still clamoring for that millionNo, I think you're reading into it. I don't believe those who carry extra are "judging" those who don't, at least I'm not.
If you don't want to carry extra, fine. We all choose our level of risk. Would you judge someone harshly for not carrying a gun at all? I wouldn't. It's a personal choice.
As for the cliches, they are simple statements of fact. You cannot deny the truth of them. Just because they're true doesn't make them condescending. For anything, most of the time, it's better to have it an not need it than need it and not have it. You might not like it, but it's true.
Id like to see people coming at you after a shot to the heart or the head with a .380. There shouldnt ever be a need to have to resort to a rifle after emptying your handgun unless youre police or military. If you do, you may need to take a marksmanship classPoint being handguns are not very effective man stoppers if you still haven't neutralized a threat after emptying your side arm completely you better get to a rifle
Yeah, because it's so easy to hit someone in the head.Id like to see people coming at you after a shot to the heart or the head with a .380.
That's a pretty big rock you're throwing in a very small glass house. Maybe you should take my challenge and then tell us again who needs to get trained...There shouldnt ever be a need to have to resort to a rifle after emptying your handgun unless youre police or military. If you do, you may need to take a marksmanship class
Lets look at previous examplea of regular people who have run out of rounds and needed a rifle.Yeah, because it's so easy to hit someone in the head.![]()
That's a pretty big rock you're throwing in a very small glass house. Maybe you should take my challenge and then tell us again who needs to get trained...
http://smith-wessonforum.com/concea...746-rastoffs-challenge-dropping-gauntlet.html
http://smith-wessonforum.com/concealed-carry-self-defense/421991-rastoffs-challenge-ii.html
Lets look at previous examplea of regular people who have run out of rounds and needed a rifle.
You knwo rastoff. Im just not going to reply before things get real heated. Im out.
You're correct to ask about those who needed a rifle. I doubt we'll find many, if any, examples of that.Lets look at previous examplea of regular people who have run out of rounds and needed a rifle.
You knwo rastoff. Im just not going to reply before things get real heated. Im out.
Point being handguns are not very effective man stoppers if you still haven't neutralized a threat after emptying your side arm completely you better get to a rifle
And I challenge you to find an example of a CCW holder in a a critical incident who ran out of bullets before he ran out of bad guys. Like the "blood in the streets" predictions of CCW opponents, it just doesn't happen . . .
My father once told me " son... it is better to have it and not need it ... than ...not have it and need it"
carry a few spare mags
![]()
Heated on my end rastoff. I was getting emotional and had to back off. And still do.You're correct to ask about those who needed a rifle. I doubt we'll find many, if any, examples of that.
There's no need to get heated. You made a comment that I believe is correct. The implication was that if a person is hit in the head or heart they will stop, even if it was the much berated .380Auto. This is absolutely correct. The baddest guy in the world will at least be slowed down enough to allow a defender to get away if they are shot in the face.
Then the comment was made about "needing training" if they still needed a rifle after expending all the ammo in one mag. Well, since this is about a defense situation, don't you think it's valuable to know how well you can shoot? I certainly would want to know that before I carried a gun into a situation. So, I've made a couple of tests for people to try. No one is obligated to try them, but they do offer an opportunity for guys to test themselves. Try it. What do you have to lose?
Point being handguns are not very effective man stoppers if you still haven't neutralized a threat after emptying your side arm completely you better get to a rifle