Dougaz
Member
Let's try this ....
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Mn49k9xoxU[/ame]
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Mn49k9xoxU[/ame]
Nope. Not me.
I live a short 20 miles from the occupied zone. And there have been quiet protests here as well.
I don't go where I'm not wanted. I'm good with that.
Here is the actual criminal complaint. Five (5) felonies with firearm enhancement; one misdemeanor. The last guy the kid shot had his hands in the air, clearly empty. CLICK HERE to read the criminal complaint filed against Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha County | | journaltimes.com
I read what was in the link but it's only one page.
The complaint means nothing because it is clearly biased.
You're a cop. You know charges and the lack of charges are often Politically motivated. These animals assaulted a kid. One of them had a gun and looked like he was prepared to use it. He won't be charged. Matter of fact, that lowlife will more than likely sue, saying the police (the ones he is calling to be disbanded) didn't protect him.
If I felt that charges were political I'd never have worked in policing. I'm finishing my 41st year in the industry.
The criminal complaint is a probable cause statement. As you are aware, more detailed evidence is for the grand jury or preliminary hearing. If the decedents or the wounded victim were armed, that would have been in the complaint; do note the police had the videos as well and both they and the DA are accountable for what's in the complaint.
Criminal histories of victims are irrelevant in court. Period.
Shooting someone whose empty hands are in the air means at least one count isn't really vulnerable to the affirmative defense of 'self-defense' or 'defense of others.'
I believe in the 2nd Amendment; I also believe the 5th and 6th are more germane to this discussion.
If I felt that charges were political I'd never have worked in policing. I'm finishing my 41st year in the industry.
The criminal complaint is a probable cause statement. As you are aware, more detailed evidence is for the grand jury or preliminary hearing. If the decedents or the wounded victim were armed, that would have been in the complaint; do note the police had the videos as well and both they and the DA are accountable for what's in the complaint.
Criminal histories of victims are irrelevant in court. Period.
Shooting someone whose empty hands are in the air means at least one count isn't really vulnerable to the affirmative defense of 'self-defense' or 'defense of others.'
I believe in the 2nd Amendment; I also believe the 5th and 6th are more germane to this discussion.
If this is what a "greater America" looks like, no thank you. To those condoning murder on American streets thinking this is good for the 2nd amendment , God help us.
Wait, you don't think it's justifiable to shoot someone because they threw a plastic bag at you? What kind of American are you? I mean, I'm sure a bunch of armchair video investigators know more than the witnesses and police who were actually at the scene and saw what actually happened and what was left behind...
The kid's a real piece of work. Self-styled militia member (aka, white supremacist) with delusional hero complex. Among other things, he was apparently going around all night claiming he's an EMT - nevermind that you can't be licensed as an EMT until you're 18.
Focusing on the criminal histories of the deceased is just a distraction meant to shift focus away from the responsibility of the one person there who actually pulled a trigger in this incident.