S&W Quality?

Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
4
Reaction score
3
Just purchased a new 686 talo plus. First time shooting the gun one shell would not eject from the cylinder. Thought it was an ammo issue. Shot another seven rounds, same issue. Tried again with different ammo same result. Took the gun to my local gunshop after inspection they noticed one of the cylinders was not machined smoothed. They sent the gun to S&W for repair have not received the gun back yet.

I'm disappointed that they let this gun leave the factory. I think
the quality control there has issues.

S&W has always been known for quality that is why we pay a little more $$ for them.:mad:
 
Register to hide this ad
Yep. I got a 63 that's junk. It went back once. Now my range gunsmith is going to try to get a replacement for me.
They don't make 'em like they used to. But they charge four times as much.

I bought a 63 (no dash) about 1980/81? for my then girlfriend (now wife). It would not eject shells. In order to extract them you had to hit the end of the extractor rod on the side of the bench to knock them loose. Took it to my gunsmith and he said the radius on the extractor portion was not lining up with the radius of the chamber, there was a little ledge. He polished them down for me and it has worked fine for the last 35+ years.

I guess they do make them like they used too.
 
Welcome to the forum.

I feel your pain. It's disappointing when the gun you were looking forward to has issues. The good news is that the "L" frame design is rock solid, and once repaired will be a very dependable and enjoyable firearm.

I haven't been shooting that long or have very many firearms, but the ones I have were all bought new, with an expectation they should work properly. So far, I've had out-of-the-box function failures that required rework or gun replacements on:

A Mossberg rifle
A M&P pistol
A Rossi rifle
A SIG pistol
A S&W revolver, returned twice before fixed ("L" frame like yours)
A Walther pistol

Good luck.

PS, if you need to get it repaired again, a short call to customer service will yield a free shipping label e-mailed to you. Then you can be sure it gets sent immediately, and get notified by e-mail of it's status.
 
Last edited:
Just remember that there isnt a manufacturer out there that does not have one bad apple for every 500 good ones. It just sucks when you are the person who got the bad apple.

Smith is still great quality when you think about it. Taurus revolvers probably have 10 bad apples in 500.......Ruger somewhere in the middle.....Colt I wouldnt touch right now with them in backruptcy.

My point is that give Smith a chance to fix the issue, if it is taking a while then I would assume they see something that is very irregular and are looking deep into the problem.
 
By the way, that was one reason I went with Galleryofguns. When you buy a gun from them, you dont go to the OEM for any issues, you to go them and they issue you a BRAND NEW firearm and handle the bad one themselves and probably resell it later.
 
This is an all too often repeated topic. I solved my S&W quality problems..

20170303_164429_zpsntoxoge2.jpg
 
This is an all too often repeated topic. I solved my S&W quality problems..

20170303_164429_zpsntoxoge2.jpg

They're nice, but tough to find

I shot the K6 at SHOT and found it very uncomfortable. The blackstrap/grips need more of a radius. It really bites, especially with magnums.
 
By the way, that was one reason I went with Galleryofguns. When you buy a gun from them, you dont go to the OEM for any issues, you to go them and they issue you a BRAND NEW firearm and handle the bad one themselves and probably resell it later.

Good to know. I bought this one from Grab A Gun.
 
This is an all too often repeated topic. I solved my S&W quality problems..

20170303_164429_zpsntoxoge2.jpg
I'm sure its a fine revolver, but I can guarantee that if you jump on to the Kimber Talk forum somebody will be complaining about an issue they're having with the gun I've read several. Such is the nature of online forums.


Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 
Back in the late '70s we replaced our blued Model 15s w/the "new" stainless models. Quite a few needed the range master to make a few repairs before they could be issued, and some were so bad they had to be returned to the factory. This is nothing new.
 
By the way, that was one reason I went with Galleryofguns. When you buy a gun from them, you dont go to the OEM for any issues, you to go them and they issue you a BRAND NEW firearm and handle the bad one themselves and probably resell it later.

I just bought a 627-5, 4" through Gallery of Guns,and because of all the S&W QC complaints on the web, I went over it with a fine tooth comb, and glad to say it is thus far flawless, and a real quality revolver. It's still in jail for a week, but I sure didn't want to give it back until then.:D

Cheers to S&W for producing some of the finest quality and most attractive revolvers out there. It's also nice to know that I have a guarantee of complete satisfaction, or I can send it back.
 

Attachments

  • 20170223_154116.jpg
    20170223_154116.jpg
    56.4 KB · Views: 101
I sure miss the old S&W. My older ones are 100% good. My two new ones are 100%... back to the factory.
 
I sent a new S&W Sigma back to the factory, and they repaired it good. I also sent a classic old model 681 back to the factory, and the repair was not quite so good.

I also have Ruger back at the factory. It happens to all gun makers, now and then. Had a couple of pristine vintage S&W revos with issues...obviously wasn't wear and tear as they had little wear. Go figure.
 
Back
Top