Sandy Hook shooting a managed event?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lets look at just 1 part of this: the allegation that stand in actors have been used to portray parents. Namely 1 Robbie Parker, father of a victim named Emilie.
I think all of us likely have seen the video: the Dad approaching the mic, laughing and smiling, then a moment later he preps himself to make a statement, and literally before our eyes he transforms himself into a haunted looking, sleepless man who looks and sounds terrible.
If the accusation of this man being an actor is false, then ask yourself where is the rebuttal? With so many anti's out there wishing to label us all as some kind of freak nutcases, you'd think they would jump at the the chance to show the world how twisted We all are. But instead, silence. I think this lack of rebuttal speaks loudly. I wake up every day thinking "maybe this is the day that an explanation will be given", but instead the silence continues.
Interesting. Think about it.
 
Within 2 or 3 days of this event, the Connecticut coroner made the statements that all the bullet wounds were inflicted with a high powered rifle, and also that the rifle was a .223 caliber.

tilt.

Say what?
Now, I don't doubt that a seasoned forensic pathologist can tell the difference between a high powered rifle wound versus a handgun wound. No problem. But since when can the same man determine the differences between a .22, .24, or a .25 caliber wound?
As a bullet passes through flesh and creates a wound channel, the flesh expands outward from the passing bullet, then a moment later contracts and closes off the channel. There is no way even an expert pathologist can determine the caliber of the bullet. Or are we to believe that he found a lot of intact, undamaged AR15 bullets inside the kids bodies, not having exited?
Plus, it's a little unusual for the coroner involved in the investigation of a crime to be the one who identifies the caliber of the gun used at a press conference.
 
Your "fix" was grammatically inconsistent, and didn't change my sentense to convey the point you were trying to make, hence my confusion. Thanks for clearing it up.

Sorry about that. I am thick with cold and sinus cooties, and with that combo I probably should not post late at night.:eek:
 
The first report I got from the news was that some shots were fired at the school. No one was injured and two people had run into the woods and were being searched for by police using dogs.

Next morning I get the other story: 20 some people dead, etc.

One CANNOT trust any news reports; especially in the early hours.

The mass media will put out absolutely any story in order to be FIRST......and they will kill for An Exclusive.......lord I hate that expression!!
 
This guy (below vid) wasn't invited on the show by mistake. While he did have some facts that were on his side, they were completely lost somewhere between 911 conspiracy and mass suicide pills.

Agreed, start off your rebuttal or opening statements with "Global Bankers" or "Mao killed 80 million people " and automatically people are reaching for the remote controller to change to the ball game or keyboard to post ridicule of the "tin hat" guy on some lefty kook blog.

These are hard learned lessons for me and the way I counteract and protect myself from being labeled extreme by real kooks is to use subtle humor and real facts when talking or debating around the low infos. Usually the person you are debating with is not going to change their position no matter what facts you present. Don't exaggerate your position, your position on the 2nd amendment is easily defended by using examples of great Americans and their intent of affirming out rights in the Constitution with the Bill of Rights.

Our positions on the 2nd amendment is the superior position, it was written into the Constitution and explaining it in a clear concise manner. State the case without making personal insults or referring to extreme cases as Hitler, Mao etc... That's the fastest way to have others discount what your saying. Be firm and confident about your position. Don't yell or raise your voice too much. An increase in volume is sometimes called for to show passion in your story.

Turning the tables on the gun banner is easy. You do it it with soft humor and make them them lose their cool and let them sound extreme and look like a kook. You saw it with Piers Morgan. However, when Morgan called Larry Pratt a stupid man on air, Morgan lost the little bit of credibility he had.The good thing though is that more people signed the petition to deport him than actually watch the show or even CNN in one day.

You can't be everything to everybody. You just have to stand on your principles and defend them without resorting to extreme behavior. Watch this video this what I mean.

http://youtu.be/sC6MnwknfmU
 
Last edited:
I've heard that thing about the rifle being in the car too. Would like for someone to definitively say what bullets were used to put this one to rest.

Cajun has a darn good point....The Bushmaster must be an amazing rifle...It can been in two places at once....I have heard it both ways..I still don't know what was used..You would think the weapon would be in the intial repoprt.....It should have been laying by his sorry butt body..
 
I hate to bring this up to the top again, as I don't really ever believe in conspiracy theories, but this video just came to me via email, and after watching it plenty of doubts come to mind. Please take a look and tell me what you think. It has been viewed 5.5 million times.

The Sandy Hook Shooting - Fully Exposed - YouTube
 
Stop this!

Please mods and Mr. Ejector...ban posts like this...the ultimate in tin foil hatted stupidity. :-(

Yes, I can refute the "facts" therein.

Anyone with Google can.

Be safe

I hate to bring this up to the top again, as I don't really ever believe in conspiracy theories, but this video just came to me via email, and after watching it plenty of doubts come to mind. Please take a look and tell me what you think. It has been viewed 5.5 million times.

The Sandy Hook Shooting - Fully Exposed - YouTube
 
Please mods and Mr. Ejector...ban posts like this...the ultimate in tin foil hatted stupidity. :-(

Yes, I can refute the "facts" therein.

Anyone with Google can.

Be safe

I did not watch the video. However, why don't you ease up there Mr. Stalin. No one appointed you to govern what people see or don't see. Let people choose to watch it, if they wish to, decide if they believe it etc. We do not need more PC censorship in this country.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top