Sigma FAQ

Thanks for the info. After much thought, I recently picked up a used SW40VE. Will first shoot next week, but am so far very satisfied with fit and finish. And if I dare say so - it feels more comfortable in the hand than my Glock G23. Certainly wish that S&W would expand the Sigma line to compete with some of Glock's offerings. I realize that S&W is placing much of their product development efforts into other weapons, such as the M&P line, but I hope they continue to add to, and refine the Sigma series.
 
He's pulling your leg. The manual says you can shoot any SAAMI ammunition, which includes +P.
Shoot all the +P you can stand; the gun will be fine.
If you have "improved" the gun by removing springs from the sear assembly, you may get failures to reset (think single shot).

Actually I misread it and thought he said +P+ which is not recommended to shoot in any S&W handgun. +P should be fine. Just keep it away from the pre-1958 K frames. :)
 
reworked signa

I put about 300 rounds through my signa 9MM and I just didn't like it. It never shot the same way twice. Always had a hard pull but sometimes it was just a bear to shoot. Well I had two options, one sell it for what I could get for it or send it back into S&W. I sent it in and that was the best thing I ever did. It just is a completely different gun. Trigger pull is softer and EVEN every time. I have to THANK S&W for their customer service. I have been thinking of a 40 cal and now with what I know, I probably will go ahead with that purchase.
THANKS AGAIN, S&W!!!!:)
 
OK I read through the FAQs but didn't see the answer to my question.

I have the 40VE, since I live in the sticks, gun stuff is limited so I rely on Midway.

I want a couple of extra mags, all I can find is mags for the 40F, are they the same as for the 40VE
 
OK I read through the FAQs but didn't see the answer to my question.

I have the 40VE, since I live in the sticks, gun stuff is limited so I rely on Midway.

I want a couple of extra mags, all I can find is mags for the 40F, are they the same as for the 40VE

Yes the 40F mags will fit the 40VE. The only difference in the 2 guns is the barrel and slide length.
 
Last edited:
Can someone post a pic of the f magazine in the ve? Just like to check it out compared to the ve mag before I purchase a couple of 15 round mags.
 
Question: is a shaky/rattly slide normal for a sw9ve? when i shake the gun it sounds like there is something loose inside...but only if i have round or snap cap in the chamber. It also feels a little loose when i pull the slide back when its empty to reset the sear.

edit: heres a quick video, wierd noise at 1:05 loose slide at 0:39
 
Last edited:
Question: is a shaky/rattly slide normal for a sw9ve? when i shake the gun it sounds like there is something loose inside...but only if i have round or snap cap in the chamber. It also feels a little loose when i pull the slide back when its empty to reset the sear.

edit: heres a quick video, wierd noise at 1:05 loose slide at 0:39

No link for the video... But, mine rattles. Here a thread about it http://smith-wessonforum.com/smith-wesson-sigma-pistols/123077-sigma-40-problem.html
 
Can someone post a pic of the f magazine in the ve? Just like to check it out compared to the ve mag before I purchase a couple of 15 round mags.

Link to a thread covering this topic. Pics inside.
 
Only hickup I have ever had was shooting blazer aluminum.
I too have had problems with Blazer ammo in many guns. But, it has ONLY been with Blazer aluminum rounds. All of my guns reliably shoot Blazer Brass. As a matter of fact, both of my 1911's and both Glock 9mm's shoot the B. brass ammo better than any other practice ammo.

Ceapea
 
I too have had problems with Blazer ammo in many guns. But, it has ONLY been with Blazer aluminum rounds. All of my guns reliably shoot Blazer Brass. As a matter of fact, both of my 1911's and both Glock 9mm's shoot the B. brass ammo better than any other practice ammo.

Ceapea

aluminum is cheaper though, im sitting on 350 rounds of it in my stash so ill see how it goes. I got a dman good deal on some and i couldnt pass it up.
 
As far as the aluminum Blazer, I haven't had any issues. I'm basing this off of about 800 rounds through my G27, but have yet to put any through my Sigma.
 
SIGMA History

Gentlemen, If I might. I was one of the first LEO's in my area to welcome the S&W SIGMA. I was thrilled that S&W, a long time, trusted American weapon manufacture decided to challenge almighty Glock in the LE world. S&W wanted to regain lost market share. If your old enough to remember, at one time in these United States, the ONLY weapon most LEO's carried was a S&W revolver in several different models. I still have my issue model 65-5 and shoot it very well. In the early to mid 90's, the "Wonder" LE weapon was the Glock 17. Glock knocked a home run as American Police scrambled to upgrade to automatic pistols. The trigger on the Glock auto was very similar to a double action revolver and the transition was easy for the LEO. S&W went from King of the Hill to "Who?" almost overnight. Smith decided to fight fire with fire and bring out their version of a polymer LE pistol. And Smith actually spent a very large sum of money(approx. $1,000,000 A lot, back then!) and time researching what makes a hand filling, comfortable grip on a pistol. End result was the SIGMA. As I learned years later, Smith was in financial strain and the "Bean Counters" forced the R&D department to release the weapon before it was ready. So while I was absolutely thrilled to use a modern, polymer LE pistol manufactured in the good 'ol USA, the end results were less than good. No sooner than the pistol was introduced, S&W announced upgrade parts. I took the S&W armorers course around that time and was trained as a Sigma armorer. I was shown how to adjust the weapon when it didn't work right. And a lot of them were not working right. And, try as we might, Armorers could not make them run right. I know because I tried and tried with no luck. Pistols were getting returned to S&W, left and right. Several US LE agencies had jumped on the SIGMA band wagon wanting an American made, polymer auto pistol and hey, it was S&W, what could go wrong? Constant operating problems that S&W had a hard time tuning out of the SIGMA, that's what could go wrong. Result? SIGMA's were now considered to be ill conceived junk, and LE departments were not happy with the overall reliability of the pistol. With Police budgets tight, a lot of departments were now stuck with a pistol that didn't work. A large amount of people using the SIGMA started talking about what kind of junk and jam-a-matic it was. And then Glock sued S&W for patent infringement. Glock said the SIGMA was a direct copy(BTW, It's not. It is similar but it's not a copy). S&W settled out of court with Glock and everyone thought that was the end of the SIGMA. S&W let the weapon languish for a short time as they re-engineered the whole weapon. End result after a time was the SW9VE. Now S&W had a good, strong, reliable polymer weapon that felt great in the hand. Problem now was a very bad reputation that S&W has been trying to live down for years. Original SIGMAs had a 4-5 lb trigger pull, a la Glock(but with a different "stack". More revolver like, for LEO's). New 9VE's have 10+lb trigger and I do not know if that is because of the Lawsuit with Glock, or, as I have heard, Mass State law on handguns. I have heard both. While S&W has stated that their most popular handgun is a SIGMA, based on sales, observe the fact that S&W has now announced a new pistol, the SD9 and 40. Close observation illustrates that the SD is a newly redesigned, reworked SIGMA. The SIGMA is easy to produce and takes no hand fitting just like Glocks. But the reputation of SIGMAs will not die(I love 'em and recommend them. You ought to hear the crap I hear about SIGMAs all the time. It's become an Urban Legend around the Gunstores!) and I believe S&W has decided to try get away from the SIGMA poison by bringing out the SD. From what I have seen of the SD, it should be a winner. And 1 other interesting note for people to contemplate on(and then I'll shut up. Sorry, I am a SIGMA fan). If the SIGMA was such a bad weapon in general, why does S&W sell the bejeezuz out of them, price not withstanding. Because they work and work very well, period.
BTW, because of past problems and reputation, S&W will warranty and replace any of the older model SIGMAs that have problems. And that was a lot of them. 16 years after the SIGMAs introduction and problems, S&W will still make a old model SIGMA right with repair or replacement, regardless of who owns it. Newer models, as well, if needed. My kinda Company. S&W, I love 'em.
My apologies for the lengthy post, but a lot do not know the history of the SIGMA. I do. I was there. (With respects to Elmer Keith, RIP)
Ofc.JL
 
Welcome to the club!

Very nice post, indeed! You'll find that we have over 100 members in the club, please search and vote in the polls.

This is the one place that I've found where I'm happy to share my sigma stories with a bunch of fine poeple who love this gun.

Best wishes,

Lee
 
I just got a .40ve and am very happy thus far. This forum (and price) really helped in the decision to buy.
 
Just got my SW9VE

And just found this forum. Looks like some great information and some good people. I didn't have much time when I bought it so only got half an hour range time with it. I hope I can get used to the trigger before too long. Almost wore me out! I actually got a pretty good deal with $20 off at the time of sale and the $50 rebate (to arrive sometime) and it already had the CTC laser installed. The nearest range is only open Saturdays so I have to wait to run a hundred or so rounds through it.
 
You asked....

Does anyone else have a problem with the squared off front floor plate on the magazine of the SW40VE ?

It just doesn't seem to be a smooth transition with the base of the handle.

Would it do any harm to remove some of the forward edge to make a smoother transition.

Sanding or grinding ? What would you suggest ?
 
Back
Top