Snarky Responses

That is a great example of where to direct a new person too, it really can be a help if the person in my example inherited the firearm and just the firearm only. No real effort to provide the information and a bonus is the person may stick around because folks here are welcoming and helpful to someone just starting out.

Plus, the manual is The Authoritative Source of info, not a bunch of snarky strangers on the internet.
 
While perusing the Web I saw a reference to the "smart alecky nature of the Army." I met far too many officers and NCOs who used sarcasm and snarkiness to cover up their ignorance and incompetence. I recall a recent article in American Rifleman where the author cited the case of a new range manager who banished some of the old timers who were alienating new shooters.
 
I had followed that thread and checked out the OP's other posts on the forum, he could dish out the snark too. After this comment
"Thanks for the info. Any of you boys ever hear of the Dale Carnegie Course? You can answer a simple question without the sarcasm. I was not aware revolvers were caliber specific. Or is that a true statement?"
.
Exactly, exactly. When that discussion got referenced early in this discussion, all I remembered was that the OP couldn't decipher friendly banter, or just as Muss said above, he was just looking to be offended.

Is there some snark and sarcasm here? Sure. Is it an epidemic that we should pray over and reinvent ourselves? HARDLY.

Don't miss this: if you are one of the many who think that snarky comments on the S&W forum alienate younger generations to guns, shooting and S&W (ludicrous), take a look at the dumpster fire collection of threads and discussions that are straight up rants against younger people. Constantly. From your experience at McDonald's to that durned whipper snapper that blocked your gas pump.

A large percentage of the Lounge area of this site seems to be Facebook for middle aged and older folks to complain about the generation that they raised and the generation of their grandchildren.

A 24 year old gun owner and shooter can easily handle some internet sarcasm on a revolver model confusion. But he's probably lost interest in the site due to your complaints regarding highway traffic.
 
I think it is generally Jack Daniels doing the thinking! As a slight variation to something I saw Rusty post (the Send Button is 75% larger when you have been drinking) I think the Send Button increases in size with each drink one takes!

Thanks for the shout-out..




A freebie:

 
Sevens and pawngal:

I never said I was perfect. I didn't say I haven't been snarky in the past. I'm just trying to do better. I regret my past mistakes. Furthermore, my comment that "snarkism" reflects upon the speaker not the target applies to me as well.
 
When You ask a question and then argue every point made, You are not learning anything. One of My favorite teachers once said " if Your mouth is running You're not learning.".I try to make My point in as few words as possible, and fail often. Those end up under the delete button. If I can point out something without snark or snide, I do. If not I keep My mouth shut as I don't like to get dinged.
 
To my knowledge there are no infractions for sarcasm. Sarcasm can be clever, witty and funny. If done correctly It can be verbal slapstick and everyone gets that no malice is intended and usually understand the humor behind it. The humorless are collateral damage as they are not the intended targets and, as Muss put it, they will be offended because they want to be offended.

If it is intended to hurt, demean or besmirch then it becomes snark.

In my 7 years here I have only incurred 5 points (all earned and I own them because I ignored the rules) and no timeouts.

Like Donn I play nice.

PS: your footprint here is entirely of your own making.
 
I agree with the OP. Depending on perspective, there can be a fine line between being offensive and trying hard to be cute - I know, I have a S&W rap sheet to prove it.
If you're needing some snark, sarcasm or a heavy dose of condescension, hang out on the campfire or accurate reloading sites. It frequently gets unnecessarily bloody over there.
 
Last edited:
Ignorance is a lack of knowledge not a lack of intelligence. I try not to treat it negatively. People who get burned when opening themselves up and showing their "ignorance" is a shame.

Think of it like a 10 year old kid asking the question. Would you snark all over them ? No, you would teach them. The difference here is we think the adult should know it. Well, that is on us.
 
Back before the Forum changed hands a few people were quick to lay it on and make you feel stupid.
I had my Dads Police Positive, a Ruger Std. 22 cal. and a S&W 19-4 that I bought without knowing what I really had. I heard all of the info on the Forum about what a great gun a 27-2 was.
I went to a gun show and found a new in the box 27-2 with a price that I wasn't sure about. I came home with the intention of checking on the Forum about the pricing. I was giving some info about the gun and used the word partridge instead of patridge sight and I really didn't know the correct word. The smart-asses were quick to respond but some of the members came to my aid. The price was about right but I didn't go back until the next day and it was gone.
I almost quit Forum and I am so glad that I didn't.
 
There is a lot of common sense on this forum. I had asked the question about the 27 and 29. Not surprised with some responses. Expected I guess. I should have posted directly to some of you guys. Thanks for the time and consideration. I will not hesitate to ask legitimate questions.
 
This thread has been a hoot. Differing opinions and sensitivities for sure. Kinda like life, eh? I have a pretty thick skin and it takes a lot to offend me. No, that's not a challenge, folks!

I do find some posters to be generally tiresome, though. Snarky comments, unfunny quips, what have you. At best, they don't contribute anything of value to the thread - a waste of bandwidth to use an old phrase. At worst, they manage to derail a thread or aggravate people and send it into the weeds. So, it happens.

My way of dealing with it is the Ignore feature. That squelches most of the noise I don't want to listen to. Periodically, when I see a member's post is hidden, I'll log out and view the post as a non-member. Usually that hidden post turns out to be as expected. I didn't miss anything, my assessment of the poster still holds and I go back to ignoring them. Easy peasy!

Call me arrogant if you like. It won't hurt my feelings and you may be little bit right!
 
There is a lot of common sense on this forum. I had asked the question about the 27 and 29. Not surprised with some responses. Expected I guess. I should have posted directly to some of you guys. Thanks for the time and consideration. I will not hesitate to ask legitimate questions.

Keep on asking, Horseapple! Your question about the 27 and 29 was completely legitimate. The great thing about this forum is we can all learn from each other and make some friends along the way. Stay with us!
 
There is a lot of common sense on this forum. I had asked the question about the 27 and 29. Not surprised with some responses. Expected I guess. I should have posted directly to some of you guys. Thanks for the time and consideration. I will not hesitate to ask legitimate questions.
1st. I am not being snarky
2nd. To quote you " I was not aware revolvers were caliber specific" On another thread you mentioned that you had a Model 19, which by the way, shoots .38 spl & .357 mag. What other calibers did you shoot in it? You suppose a 22lr might be a little small?
3rd. I could really confuse you, I have a revolver that shoots .32 S&W, .32 H&R mag. and .327 Fed Mag. But it sure doesn't shoot .357 mag!
 
Last edited:
But that's actually a very useful reply. I could spend 20 - 30 minutes using google myself and pasting links and expanding upon the link, but the op could do the same thing and maybe just ain't thought of it. I look on it as the "Teach a man to fish and he won't ask questions that may elicit snarky replies . . . "

I too fall on this side of the fence. If someone asks a question on this board that a 5 second Google search could answer, they need to know that.

And yeah, I posted a smarta**ed comment on the "27, 29" thread because of the thought above.

But when someone comes in here wanting information above and beyond a simple search, I believe I've always been polite and accommodating; it's the same treatment I was given when I came in here 8-9 years ago. And sure, I asked some (in retrospect) dumb questions and will probably continue to do so. Snarky answers don't bother me, it's the Internet not charm school.
 
You want to see snark ? Just try being a resident of California and wait for all the replies that are of absolutely no benefit to the conversation or topic at hand.
I guess some people think they need some typing practice.

Yep. Every time see a thread started about California I put my egg timer on to see how quickly someone says: "you need to move".
 
Snark will reap its own reward. We know a little bit about Karma.
As far as " googling" something, yeah I've done it but I'm trying to wean myself off of google and the like. Besides, it's kind of sterile, you know?
Asking here is like sitting around with friends sometimes and if a friend asks me a question, I won't tell him/her to google it.
It's just simple human communication. Not a bad thing.
 
I used to be bad about this but it was not always meant to be snarky. I used to do it because people are poor listeners and a short to the point direct answer got peoples attention. And it didn't help the group I used to hang with though it was hilarious.
But then after awhile I and they got tired of it.
I asked WWJD and I learned that sometimes the loudest response is no response at all.
 
Back
Top