nocents
Member
My buddy has a Ruger SP101 with a broken firing pin, and nobody has them available. Bob
OMG....say it ain't so


My buddy has a Ruger SP101 with a broken firing pin, and nobody has them available. Bob
Your welcome! And enjoy! They don't do anything that my Glocks don't. If the roles were reversed I'd dump Glocks just as fast. If HK stops making parts I'd dump them too.
You're right and I probably wouldn't sell if I could go online and order a armorer's kit. I also prefer no mag safety and palm swell rubber grips. Searching for those gets to be annoying. Overall I sold of a 4046, 4006 tactical, two 4506, 4586, two 5946, 1006 and a 1026. I have one 4566 left that I promised to a reletive.
Yea I treat them as tools.
We'll see, maybe the next 4506 or the DA/SA shorter version of said gun I stumble across I'll buy and just find parts for that one to keep on hand. This way I wouldn't need to scrounge for parts for several different 3rd gen
Ugly and pissy, too. I just learned that Glocks need replacement springs every 1500-3000 rounds or it starts malfunctioning! And while that doesn't raise red flags with most, look at it this way: my old obsolete Ruger Security-Six revolver will go 30,000+ magnum rounds and perhaps many more.I'm with 18DAI on this. Striker fired plastic guns are ugly.
Ugly and pissy, too. I just learned that Glocks need replacement springs every 1500-3000 rounds or it starts malfunctioning!
I have to call BS on this one. I have a Glock 17 with 8700 rounds through it and a Glock 26 with 7100 rounds down the pipe. Neither one has ever had a part replaced. Ever. Both are boringly reliable and pass all the function checks.
That said, I won't sell my CS9. I would consider a 3913 if I found a clean one. TDA triggers are awesome.
The service/round count intervals given to Glock armorers for recoil spring assembly (RSA) replacement have been shrinking over the years.
In my first class the instructor didn't want to be pinned down to any round count or time-in-service. The students kept throwing numbers at him until he finally said that leaving a spring in a gun for 8 years was probably too long.
In my last recert class the instructor said the pre-Gen4 compact/full-size guns ought to have new RSA's at least every 3K rounds, and 2K would be better, still.
The Gen4 compact & full-size models that use the double spring RSA's are supposed to be good for 5-6K rounds between RSA replacement.
The .40/.357 guns are the hardest on the RSA's, with the 9's having probably the easiest time of it.
I have a Glock armorer "wearable parts replacement schedule" from '08, for LE .40's, that recommends RSA replacement at 2,500 rds for the G22/35; 2K rds for the G23 and 3K rds for the G27 ... or sooner, as may be necessary, depending on performing a field RSA check at each range session. (There were other parts and springs listed for recommended 5K round replacement intervals, too.)
Put it this way ...
As I've heard armorer instructors comment during my last couple of recerts for that company, if an armorer is seeing broken locking blocks, locking block pins, trigger pins or barrel lugs, the armorer probably isn't replacing the RSA's often enough. Probably wouldn't be making those observations if they didn't think it was prudent.
In the recent class the instructor added the comment that fresh springs keeps guns alive (especially when shooting .40's).
I tend to prefer to err on the conservative side of spring replacement intervals & recommendations. No real need to subject good guns to unnecessary battering.
I'm with 18DAI on this. Striker fired plastic guns are ugly.
While I fully understand the durability and reliability factor, unless I'm going to be deployed into some 3rd world s*&thole of a country I'm not going to shoot an ugly gun.
Smith 3rd Gens, Hi-Power, 1911s, CZ-75, real steel guns are on my list.
The service/round count intervals given to Glock armorers for recoil spring assembly (RSA) replacement have been shrinking over the years.
In my first class the instructor didn't want to be pinned down to any round count or time-in-service. The students kept throwing numbers at him until he finally said that leaving a spring in a gun for 8 years was probably too long.
In my last recert class the instructor said the pre-Gen4 compact/full-size guns ought to have new RSA's at least every 3K rounds, and 2K would be better, still.
The Gen4 compact & full-size models that use the double spring RSA's are supposed to be good for 5-6K rounds between RSA replacement.
The .40/.357 guns are the hardest on the RSA's, with the 9's having probably the easiest time of it.
I have a Glock armorer "wearable parts replacement schedule" from '08, for LE .40's, that recommends RSA replacement at 2,500 rds for the G22/35; 2K rds for the G23 and 3K rds for the G27 ... or sooner, as may be necessary, depending on performing a field RSA check at each range session. (There were other parts and springs listed for recommended 5K round replacement intervals, too.)
Put it this way ...
As I've heard armorer instructors comment during my last couple of recerts for that company, if an armorer is seeing broken locking blocks, locking block pins, trigger pins or barrel lugs, the armorer probably isn't replacing the RSA's often enough. Probably wouldn't be making those observations if they didn't think it was prudent.
In the recent class the instructor added the comment that fresh springs keeps guns alive (especially when shooting .40's).
I tend to prefer to err on the conservative side of spring replacement intervals & recommendations. No real need to subject good guns to unnecessary battering.