- Joined
- Jan 16, 2024
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 2
Not to mention identical placement of the chafing bushings. I don't recall ever seeing chafing bushings in a Spanish copy. Did any of the Spanish guns have them?The hammer and trigger return mechanism are identical in the two pictures.
Not to mention identical placement of the chafing bushings. I don't recall ever seeing chafing bushings in a Spanish copy. Did any of the Spanish guns have them?
Bottom line is that I have a difficult time believing it can be a Model 1896, Model 1903, or a Model 1902, So where does this leave us with regards to the OP's gun???????? Was there an engineering change on the cylinder stop before the rebound slide? My 61,XXX gun was shipped in 1905, so does not seem likely that you would see a new cylinder stop before the rebound slide was started??
And here is a picture of an equally dirty lockwork of one of my guns, before I cleaned it. Focus on the hammer and trigger, and not the front of the trigger that pulls the cylinder stop down. This gun is a transition revolver, with the new cylinder stop, but the early original hammer and trigger return mechanism.
![]()
The hammer and trigger return mechanism are identical in the two pictures. The gun in question is not a Spanish copy, but an early S&W.
Regards, Mike Priwer
Mike,Lee
Thanks for your clarification.
Regards, Mike Priwer
What about the 2nd pict in Cpt Bret post. Is the spring loaded detent very widespread in that age S&W? My prewar 38/44 OD has this feature.