JaPes
Member
I've had good and bad experiences with Taurus. My experience is that Taurus handguns that are produced on established designs are good to go. For example, the PT92 is basically an evolutionary branch of the original Beretta 92. The Taurus revolvers that were brought to market during the Taurus/S&W corporate step-children era are good.
I own a new-to-me Taurus PT92 circa 1999. It had a bent trigger bar. Taurus took it in, and had it back to me in 11 days (including transit and weekends) in perfect working order. I own a Taurus M66B6. It's been nothing but good to me, no issues.
(Don't be jealous of the tactical butter knife.
)
I had a Taurus PT709 slim that wasn't good. I had a Taurus Judge that had timing issues. I have some trigger time on the Millineum series pistols. IMO, anything that is pure Taurus design is hit-or-miss.
I own a new-to-me Taurus PT92 circa 1999. It had a bent trigger bar. Taurus took it in, and had it back to me in 11 days (including transit and weekends) in perfect working order. I own a Taurus M66B6. It's been nothing but good to me, no issues.


(Don't be jealous of the tactical butter knife.

I had a Taurus PT709 slim that wasn't good. I had a Taurus Judge that had timing issues. I have some trigger time on the Millineum series pistols. IMO, anything that is pure Taurus design is hit-or-miss.