I am a member of a large (2500 member) Texas agency which carries the M&P 40.
...
As someone who ran a large police supply business I can assure you that many, if not most, law enforcement agencies don't buy firearms based on what is best for their troops. Generally, it's what's the best deal for the purchasing authorities, department, city or county that's buying the guns. Does anyone really believe that the M-16 was the best semi-auto rifle available or that the M92 Beretta was the best semi-auto pistol that could be had? A lot of such purchase agreements are made in back rooms or at resort weekend retreats where the purchasers are wined and dined and made "offers they can't refuse." In my experience, most cops don't really care about guns that much, just enough to qualify by shooting at bullseye targets in broad daylight and many officers can go through a whole career without ever pulling a pistol out of it's holster except to clean it or qualify with it twice a year. It's just another tool, like their flashlight or duty belt....some don't even like guns.
Amen.
Many I served with didn't bother with the "clean it" part. It would be nice if every officer took firearms proficiency seriously. It would be nice if every police administrator was committed to supplying those officers with the best equipment and training available. It would be nice if politicians told the truth. It would be nice if S&W brought back the Triple Lock. It would be nice if German Shorthair Pointers lived to be 50.
This comment makes it sound like you don't believe they even have the ability to measure 10 microns (the amount mentioned in the article). Well, in the world of measurement, it's not really that small or hard.I also want to find that device that measures that in his toolbox.
The information I've been able to get out of DPS is that they're talking about the front sight moving. I have no doubt they have the capability to measure 10 microns of movement, but I question how they arrived at that number. Did they take a measurement on the brand new guns to determine exactly where the sights were positioned before they were shot? If so, why would they do that?
The information I've been able to get out of DPS is that they're talking about the front sight moving. I have no doubt they have the capability to measure 10 microns of movement, but I question how they arrived at that number. Did they take a measurement on the brand new guns to determine exactly where the sights were positioned before they were shot? If so, why would they do that?
The information I've been able to get out of DPS is that they're talking about the front sight moving. I have no doubt they have the capability to measure 10 microns of movement, but I question how they arrived at that number. Did they take a measurement on the brand new guns to determine exactly where the sights were positioned before they were shot? If so, why would they do that?
...I have one of those! My sarcasm must not have been clear enough. The point is that although you could measure it, it wouldn't be detectable on the target.This comment makes it sound like you don't believe they even have the ability to measure 10 microns (the amount mentioned in the article). Well, in the world of measurement, it's not really that small or hard.
10 microns = .0004"
This device is quite common and is capable of that measurement:
![]()
Don't get me wrong, I too think that the measurement they mentioned is a joke and insignificant to the operation of an M&P. However, it's not impossible to make that measurement and the tool, depending on what they measured, isn't uncommon.
Yeah, I completely agree. I think that "10 micron" thing was just an author trying to sound like he knew something when he really didn't....I have one of those! My sarcasm must not have been clear enough. The point is that although you could measure it, it wouldn't be detectable on the target.