bulletslap
Member
As I understand it the construction site had a no trespassing sign in front of it. My source is a business associate who is an attorney that has practiced criminal law in Georgia. He follows these sort of cases and has been my primary source of information.
His opinion is that the best defense of this case would be to establish Arbery had committed a felony, that the McMillians had information of. At that point he says that under Georgia law he would argue the McMillians had about the same right to arrest as an LEO would.
He also says if he were prosecuting the case he would inflame the jury with racial injustice accusations, argue that Arbery had not committed a felony negating the citizens arrest defense, as well as arguing that Arbery was fighting for his life. He also believes the defendants are "overcharged" as often happens in these type of cases.
This acquaintance is a damn good lawyer and can make a good case that the sky is green and the grass is blue.
His opinion is that the best defense of this case would be to establish Arbery had committed a felony, that the McMillians had information of. At that point he says that under Georgia law he would argue the McMillians had about the same right to arrest as an LEO would.
He also says if he were prosecuting the case he would inflame the jury with racial injustice accusations, argue that Arbery had not committed a felony negating the citizens arrest defense, as well as arguing that Arbery was fighting for his life. He also believes the defendants are "overcharged" as often happens in these type of cases.
This acquaintance is a damn good lawyer and can make a good case that the sky is green and the grass is blue.
Last edited: