The Russians have gone in

Status
Not open for further replies.
The WaPo Max Boot column
is a good review of much of
the war so far.

One thing that jumped out for
me was mentioning how open
the Ukrainians are in moving
supplies along the roads
because of the abscence of
air attacks.

Perhaps a joke might be
told of the Ukrainian forces
pleading for more Russian tanks
as they are running out of
them for target practice. .
 
Putin fears a coup but it's not oligarchs who will oust him — it's the siloviki

WaPo article (voa our National Post)
...The oligarchs aren't the ones who would turn on Putin. There is something of a power-sharing agreement between Putin and his oligarchical team, but it is one-sided and mostly economic... But the oligarchs have no direct access to hard power, such as police or other armed security forces in Russia.

Nor will the mythical Russian "man on the street" rise up to dethrone Putin. There are Russians who support Putin's policies, and others who have simply become politically apathetic...

The real threat to Putin comes from the siloviki, a Russian word used loosely to describe Russia's security and military elite. These are people like Nikolai Patrushev, currently the secretary of the Russian security council...

Men like Patrushev and Bortnikov not only possess hard power, but they know how to use it and are inclined to do so. The FSB includes around 160,000 members of the Border Guard service, as well as thousands of armed personnel with law enforcement authorities. But the strength of the FSB comes not only from its ability to do violence; the organization is also highly secretive. FSB officers are skilled at working clandestinely, keeping their most sensitive operations strictly compartmented to small groups. Putin understands this better than most: He once ran the organization himself....

The siloviki are willing to use this deadly mixture of hard power and secrecy when a serious threat to the Russian kleptocratic system emerges....

Steven L. Hall retired from the CIA in 2015 after 30 years of running and managing Russian operations​

Which again begs the question: If Putin goes, who will run the country? Given the scenario above, "Out of the frying pan into the fire" would seem to be the outcome.
 
I hear a lot of people questioning Ukraine, wondering if all of the support for them from across the globe is worth it, and to a certain degree misguided. We had this conversation this morning while taking up space at the local store drinking coffee. For what it's worth, which is absolutely nothing, here's my take on the subject:
First - I am under no illusion that Ukraine is the land of unicorns, cupcakes and tele tubbies. As part of the former soviet bloc, sure they have corruption and deep-rooted problems. But they appear to be a country that is working diligently to westernize, which will likely take decades...generations... to accomplish. I only need to see the actions of its citizens, the destruction of the country, to know that there has to be something there worth supporting and fighting for. It would have been too easy for them to roll over and return to their past life under the soviet boot...but their giving their all to prevent that.
Second - We have our own fair share of corruption, and hypocrisy irks me more than getting a root canal
Third - Whatever it takes to stick it to the russians.
 
Almost 10,000 Russian soldiers have died in war, according to pro-Kremlin newspaper

From The Guardian
Updated at 4.08pm EDT

Almost 10,000 Russian soldiers may have already been killed in the war in Ukraine since Russia invaded almost four weeks ago, according to reports of previously-undisclosed figures from the defence ministry in Moscow.

A pro-Kremlin tabloid said 9,861 Russian soldiers died in Ukraine and 16,153 were injured, the Wall Street Journal has reported.

Twitter posts: [I've deleted the raw URLs but they're in the link above]

Yaroslav Trofimov (@yarotrof)

Komsomolskaya Pravda, the pro-Kremlin tabloid, says that according to Russian ministry of defense numbers, 9,861 Russian soldiers died in Ukraine and 16,153 were injured. The last official Russian KIA figure, on March 2, was 498. Fascinating that someone posted the leaked number.
March 21, 2022

Others are looking into this.

Christo Grozev (@christogrozev)

I couldn't believe this was not a faked screenshot, but indeed, it's not.
March 21, 2022

These figures may now have been scrubbed from the original source.

Yaroslav Trofimov (@yarotrof)

And that graph has now been deleted!
March 21, 2022​

So not quite the 14,000 claimed by Ukraine, but far in excess of the earlier Russian staement of 498 (!)
 
Thank you for your generosity.

You're most welcome. As a Post subscriber, I can "gift" ten articles each month, so non-subscribers can read them. There has been some truly excellent reporting on this war from the Post, and insightful analysis by their opinion columnists, and I'm happy to be able to share that content.
 
What is written and printed in the Washington Post that can be believed and not politically motivated toward the present party in power.
Have they suddenly done an about face?

With respect, I think you're confusing their reporting and their editorial positions. That can perhaps be forgiven if you're not a subscriber.

I subscribe to three newspapers online, and read them most every day. The Post's reporting is terrific. They don't simply share wire service dispatches from the Associated Press or other papers; they actually have overseas bureaus, with reporters living and working in various countries around the world. That makes for great journalism any time, but it's especially valuable in a situation like this. I read everything with a very critical eye, and I rarely see political bias in their reporting.

Their editorials are another matter. The Post's editorial position is reliably liberal: pick any issue and they will be on the left side of it. I figure they're entitled to their opinions...

Their columnists are a mixed bag. Yeah, there are a number of liberals, but there are also David Von Drehle, George Will, Max Boot, Kathleen Parker, and George Gerson, all of whom are gifted writers with a conservative to moderate slant.

(Von Drehle is a brilliant wordsmith who -- like the late Col. Jeff Cooper -- can turn a phrase so eloquently that he's a pleasure to read. His column is syndicated, if I'm not mistaken, so you can read him without subscribing to the Post.)

I like reading opinions that make me think, or or help me see a given issue in a different light. And I share things to this thread that have helped me better understand the situation in Ukraine. Each of us, of course, is free to make up his own mind as to what he chooses to believe.
 
What is written and printed in the Washington Post that can be believed and not politically motivated toward the present party in power.
Have they suddenly done an about face?

The Kremlin prefers Fox.

In a 35-minute interview aired Friday on Russian state-owned television network RT, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed that Fox News is the only American media outlet that offers "alternative" points of view, and called the removal of former President Donald Trump from Twitter and other social media "censorship." Kremlin Official Laments Donald Trump's Twitter Ban, Praises Fox News

See for yourselves.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1504812959566077984
 
Last edited:
With no disrespect to anyone intended, I've always thought that your comfort with exploring views of reality and opinions opposite of your own is a good measure of how well-thought-out your own position is. If a divergent view makes you uncomfortable, that should be a warning sign. And once you start choosing your news and opinion sources based on the warm fuzzies of agreement, you're on the road to hell ;)

Diversity in sources is the name of the game. In addition to US media, throughout the day I'm usually making the rounds of overseas public news services like France24, the BBC, the DW, and even RT and Xinhua, respectively the Russian and Chinese English-language services online.

Nobody over there gives a rodent's patootie about American domestic political leanings. So you just have to keep in mind who your sources are, and compare and contrast. You'll end up with a pretty comprehensive idea of what's happening.
 
There is risk of nuclear war with Russia no matter what. Putin is making his move, first Ukraine, now it looks like Poland as well.

Putin has for decades harbored a desire to get the old band -- the USSR -- back together again, but I think most of us dismissed him as a bitter crank engaging in wishful thinking. Now the threat he poses is obvious...

I feel like the West has been unbelievably stupid and naive about this. We all watched as Putin violated the territorial integrity of other nations over and over again, not just by invading them, but by staging attacks against his critics on foreign soil, and figured -- what? -- that it wouldn't actually come to this? That having invaded and occupied Crimea (with his army of "little green men") he would stop there?

We keep re-learning the lessons of history...and it feels like 1939 all over again... :(

The Changing Story Of Russia's 'Little Green Men' Invasion
 
This Russian letter (Post #1115)
is particularly galling as it
talks about liberation. The Poles
have not forgotten the 1940
massacre of 22,000 Polish military
officers and intellectuals by the USSR.

This came about when the USSR
attacked Poland at the very same time
the Germans were attacking from
the west.

The murder of the 22,000 was not
admitted by Russia until 1990. It
had maintained the German Nazis
were the butchers.
 
The more I learn about what's been going on there and who's been involved the more I doubt many things. One needs to confirm things through multiple sources and still wonder. I pray this does not spiral into something much worse.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top