Thinking about trading in my FNS-40c for a M&P 40c

[rosborn]

The FNS-40c is fine and works just as it should but I like my S&W M&P 40 FS more. I'm thinking about trading in my FNH FNS-40c for a S&W M&P 40c. They're pretty similar in size though I'm pretty sure the FNS has larger capacity mags. My reason? I just really want to commit to Smith & Wesson as a manufacturer.

Valid reason? Your thoughts? I will also be getting a M&P Shield 40 within the next couple of months.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[Pete_H]

I like to shoot my 40c much more than I like to shoot my G27.
That's all I got on that.

 

[ultratec00]

I can only speak to my FNS9c vs. my M&P9c. I like my M&Ps but prefer the FNS9c to my M&P9c. Fits me better and more accurate out of the box, at least for me. The 40 is obviously snappier than a 9. If you haven't shot a M&P40c, might be a good thing to do before changing.

 

[Coastie762]

You can use full size M&P 40 mags in your 40C. X-grip makes an adaptor sleeve for using full size 9mm/.40 mags in the original compacts.

FWIW, I have both the .40C and FNS40C. The FN shoots well, has an excellent trigger and for the most part fits in my M&P holsters. Very little difference, size-wise between the two. FN mags are much more expensive and parts support (if needed) is problematic, however.

 

[rosborn]

Thinking about trading in my FNS-40c for a M&P 40c

Thank you got the responses. They have been helpful. I've pretty much come to the conclusion that I am going to keep the FNS. It is such a pleasure to shoot that I would be crazy to sell it to fund a M&P .40c. On the other hand, I really don't have a need for a M&P .40 FS either. So, I will be exploring the option of trading in my full size pistol for the M&P .40c.
Thanks again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro