Colonel
Member
Maybe you need the New York or Massachusetts trigger installed? When I got my first Glock, I was nervous about a AD/ND so I had the NY 1 trigger installed. The extra trigger stiffness gave ME the comfort level for a CCW pistol.
Yeah? What would that situation be?Sure there is. It happens all the time. This is like saying the gun shouldn't come out of it's holster or the safe unless you intend/have to shoot.
Yeah? What would that situation be?
Yeah? What would that situation be?
Okay, don't kill me for this. I love the trigger on my M2.0, but my department doesn't. They will be introducing a new weapon matrix requiring a 5#+ trigger pull. I qualified last night and my 2.0 pulled at between 4.5 and 4.75 using an NRA weight set (they feel digital is inaccurate). The policy isn't currently in place and could take years to implement, but I will eventually have to get it over 5#. Is this something I can get fixed under warranty? This gun is 100% factory, except the TFX pro sights. Any way I can get it over 5# on my own?
I don't understand why the continuing trend is toward lighter trigger pull weight on defense weapons. No way would I want a four and a half pound trigger on a duty or carry weapon.
The policy isn't currently in place and could take years to implement, but I will eventually have to get it over 5#.
Personally, I wouldn't worry about it until it is implemented, if it ever is. Things may change before then, and you may even have a different pistol by the time it comes into effect, if it ever does.
Okay, don't kill me for this. I love the trigger on my M2.0, but my department doesn't. They will be introducing a new weapon matrix requiring a 5#+ trigger pull. I qualified last night and my 2.0 pulled at between 4.5 and 4.75 using an NRA weight set (they feel digital is inaccurate). The policy isn't currently in place and could take years to implement, but I will eventually have to get it over 5#. Is this something I can get fixed under warranty? This gun is 100% factory, except the TFX pro sights. Any way I can get it over 5# on my own?
How about any situation where a high level show of force is needing to end or dampen a situation before it gets out of control and possibly hurts someone. But then again no one is sitting there with their finger on the trigger until it's needed.
In my estimation, limiting the, trigger pull weight, to a heavy weight, to keep a poorly trained person, from accidentally shooting themselves, or a, perceived threatening person, is absurd! It is akin to dulling a razor sharp knife to protect an unskilled knife user, from cutting themselves or others, with a knife, that's too sharp. I think It would be much better, to train the users of efficient guns, and knives, in their use, than to render the devices inefficient, to fit it to the skill of the user. If these unreasonable limit settings escalate, we may soon be required to use, both forefingers, a pry bar, or a block & tackle, just to legally, pull the trigger of our defense weapon. I think, if we admit it, that we all know, how that will effect the the speed, and accuracy, of our defensive shooting.
Chubbo
Maybe I missed something but why would a trigger pull that doesn't meet your departments particular requirement be a warranty issue for S&W? Does S&W specify an exact trigger pull or range for the trigger pull and yours is outside of that range/factory spec?
But here you have a deadly threat. If you shoot that deadly threat, you're justified. If the threat isn't deadly, or at least potentially causing great bodily harm, why are you pointing your gun at it?Any situation where you are faced with a potential deadly threat in which there would be very little time to react.
If a "show of force" is necessary holding the gun at the ready should be enough. And while we're at it, what would a situation be for a civilian where this show of force is necessary?How about any situation where a high level show of force is needing to end or dampen a situation before it gets out of control and possibly hurts someone.
But here you have a deadly threat. If you shoot that deadly threat, you're justified. If the threat isn't deadly, or at least potentially causing great bodily harm, why are you pointing your gun at it?
If a "show of force" is necessary holding the gun at the ready should be enough. And while we're at it, what would a situation be for a civilian where this show of force is necessary?