Rastoff
US Veteran
There has been much discussion on the M&P forum of the new M&P 380 EZ. There has also been a few threads on the Concealed Carry & Self Defense forum about .380Auto in general. While I'm not alone, I'm sure I've been the most prevalent dissenter of using this cartridge for self-defense. I just don't believe it to be reliable.
As proof of my skepticism, I've mentioned how many I've seen fail in person. In fact, I've stated that I've never seen one go 35 rounds without a failure. Many have responded that their's has been perfect through hundreds of rounds. I believe them, but my personal experience has, sadly, been different.
This weekend saw no change for me. I had another class. Two students brought .380Auto guns and both had at least one malfunction. The really sad part is the course of fire has changed and they only had to shoot 12 rounds. Even so, both had failures and one had multiple failures.
Until something drastic happens, I will continue to recommend not carrying a .380Auto for self-defense. I just don't think they can be counted on. The first round is usually fine. It's getting that second round to feed that's the problem.
As proof of my skepticism, I've mentioned how many I've seen fail in person. In fact, I've stated that I've never seen one go 35 rounds without a failure. Many have responded that their's has been perfect through hundreds of rounds. I believe them, but my personal experience has, sadly, been different.
This weekend saw no change for me. I had another class. Two students brought .380Auto guns and both had at least one malfunction. The really sad part is the course of fire has changed and they only had to shoot 12 rounds. Even so, both had failures and one had multiple failures.
Until something drastic happens, I will continue to recommend not carrying a .380Auto for self-defense. I just don't think they can be counted on. The first round is usually fine. It's getting that second round to feed that's the problem.