InfantryWeaponsOfficer
Member
Roger-
Respectfully, a cutlass is a different design, used by boarding parties, etc., but not a dress sword. The one in the OP is the current USN Officer's version, I'm almost sure. The cutlass is shorter and more curved. The hilt and guard are more crude, too.
The Mameluke design refers only to the hilt, the blade curve varying, although curved to one degree or the other. Basically, it is a scimitar but scimitars vary in curve and length.
I have a sword book by John Wilkinson-Latham and have another book on swords through the ages, and have examined a number of swords in collector-oriented gun shops. A high school friend had a M-1860 Light Cavalry Saber in his family, and I've handled the 1840 Heavy Cavalry version, too.
The sword that seemed most "me" is the British Infantry Officer's Model of 1897. The longer cavalry sword of 1908, copied by Patton, is too long to use well when unmounted.
Lt. Churchill mentioned the length of his cavalry sword when fighting unmounted in what is now Pakistan.
No worries. I was merely describing them visually, I will be more rigorous with my terminology in the future. I own an NCO "sabre" and an Officers Mamaluke "scimitar", both were manufactured by Weyersberg/Kirschbaum. One I purchased the other was a retirement gift. There is a significant difference in the curvature between the two. The Navy Officer swords I've seen all have nearly prefectly straight blades as do the Army NCO swords. That was my point.