My county will be voting on a resolution on Thursday night the 12th. They have moved their regular meeting from the 75 person capacity room to the high school auditorium. I reckon they are expecting a crowd. 

Declaring a county (or city) to be a Second Amendment Sanctuary in any state isn't anything other than a feel good action. Residents don't vote on them. County officials (most of whom are elected) pass these "resolutions" and "ordinances" in an attempt to convince their gun-owning constituents that they're doing something positive for them instead of wasting the county's tax dollars.
County prosecutors saying they won't prosecute gun law violations? They're employees, hired by the district attorney. They can be fired for failing to do their job. And the district attorneys themselves can be fired by the Attorney General.
County sheriffs saying they won't enforce gun laws? They're elected to office and can be removed from office by a state's governor for refusing to fulfill their duties. Just ask Broward County, Florida ex-sheriff Scott Israel about how that works. Speaking of Virginia, it wouldn't surprise me at all for Ralph Northam to fire any sheriff who won't do his job. A sheriff's job is to enforce the law, and 2A sanctuary city/county resolutions are not laws.
As others have said, and as even county officials and their legal advisors admit, these sanctuary resolutions hold no force of law. They sound great as pro-2A publicity gimmicks, but they wouldn't even come close to holding up in a court of law.
.... Politicians talk about common sense gun laws, but I haven't heard any yet.
Agreed!Virginia now has 77 Sanctuary Counties out of 95.
Allowing the grandfathering of the proposed banned guns means we are giving away the rights of future generations. None of the proposals will impact crime in a positive sense. Politicians talk about common sense gun laws, but I haven't heard any yet.
Democrat leadership is now saying that there will be grandfathering of existing, legally owned firearms. Sounds like they are now planning to resurrect the 1994 federal assault weapons ban.
It is not the 1994 federal ban:
"In this case, the governor's assault weapons ban will include a grandfather clause for individuals who already own assault weapons, with the requirement they register their weapons before the end of a designated grace period," Northam spokeswoman Alena Yarmosky said in a statement Monday evening. "Additional details on this and all other bills will be announced prior to the start of the upcoming session."
This is what dems refer to as a "reasonable start".
It is not the 1994 federal ban:
"In this case, the governor's assault weapons ban will include a grandfather clause for individuals who already own assault weapons, with the requirement they register their weapons before the end of a designated grace period," Northam spokeswoman Alena Yarmosky said in a statement Monday evening. "Additional details on this and all other bills will be announced prior to the start of the upcoming session."
This is what dems refer to as a "reasonable start".
Democrat leadership is now saying that there will be grandfathering of existing, legally owned firearms. Sounds like they are now planning to resurrect the 1994 federal assault weapons ban.
Northam-backed assault weapon bill will include 'grandfather clause' for existing guns - Virginia Mercury