Lenny_D
Member
Reading through this thread has really saddened me. I can see some of us have no idea what the 2nd was written for and some of us are willing to concede rights that our forebearers have died for. It's exactly what the antis want. To fracture us where we say one gun is bad and another is ok because its the right color or it doesn't have scary looking parts on it. Does anyone really believe it will stop with the banning of military looking rifles. It will progress to any semi auto then pumps and levers and then bolts.
A person whose gun was stolen is no more responsible for a crime committed with that gun than a person whose car was stolen and used in a crime or whose perscription drugs were stolen and sold. You are blaming someone other than the perpetrator.
I am not convinced that we should concede anything. This is the time to stand united. Some sound as though they are ready to tuck tail and run. I will be calm and state facts in all my dealings with the anti gunners but I will not negotiate away my rights as a free man.
Len
A person whose gun was stolen is no more responsible for a crime committed with that gun than a person whose car was stolen and used in a crime or whose perscription drugs were stolen and sold. You are blaming someone other than the perpetrator.
I am not convinced that we should concede anything. This is the time to stand united. Some sound as though they are ready to tuck tail and run. I will be calm and state facts in all my dealings with the anti gunners but I will not negotiate away my rights as a free man.
Len