Is it just me, or do the 'forecasters" get even LESS accurate with the more "visual aids" they put on the screen?
We have a gen-u-wine meterologist up here. Johanna Wagstaffe is the on-air meteorologist, seismologist and scientist for CBC VANCOUVER NEWS and CBC NEWS NETWORK...Used to be more accurate when the news just had "weathermen/women" and a chart than meterologists with the latest warp-powered super mega doppler radar of death...
"Most accurate" weather reporting is like claiming to be the best shot--because you came closest to actually hitting the barn."...get even LESS accurate with the more "visual aids"..."
Is that even possible?![]()
When I was gainfully employed years ago, many times we used the US Air Force Global Weather Service for mission planning and operations. We typically had 2 of their personnel (NCOs) with us on operations who communicated with Offutt AFB on an "as needed" basis.I spoke with a gentleman some years back. He had been a meteorologist for the USAF in Germany in the '60s He said they do a much better job of "forecasting" now with all the extra goodies they have. Hard to believe. But predicting most future events is not easy in any case.