What qualities or features do you think separates the best holsters from the rest?
Last edited:
…the great holster makers (I.E. Milt Sparks, Kramer, Lobo Leather, Nightengale, Mitch Rosen, El Paso Saddlery, etc...)
I have had a few holsters in my short few years carrying and I'm curious what some of the more experienced people on these forums thinking regards to what separates the great holster makers (I.E. Milt Sparks, Kramer, Lobo Leather, Nightengale, Mitch Rosen, El Paso Saddlery, etc...) From the rest of the pack. I've had a few Galco holsters that worked well for me in the past and here they seem to get a lot of hate. I ordered a Kramer IWB and an OWB from Lobo which I am very excited for as I do believe you get what you pay/wait for. That being said, what should I expect over a mass produced holster like Galco? From what I've heard here a lot of it deals with longevity (Kramer Horsehide lasts decades from what I've seen) or craftsmanship/innovation (Lobo has some of the most innovative and beautiful holster designs I've ever seen).
I hear people talk about "boning" and "stitch quality" a lot. I guess in a sentence, my question is essentially this. What makes these elite holster makers with long lead times stand apart from the rest in your experience?
Hi, Kevin. I never heard of Nightengale, but why shouldn't EPS be on the list? Because they are considered more old west and historical or has quality diminished? I think a holster maker might get in trouble posting here because it might be considered self promotion or advertising that can get you reprimanded.Sorry, El Paso does not belong in that group. Not sure about Nightengale either. To me, what separates the good from the rest? Do they listen to what you want! For example, I like fixed sighted revolvers. If a company tells me the same holster works for a Model 10 and a Model 19, I move on. I want a holster crafted for my particular model of revolver, not some generic bag that can carry any handgun.
If you want good leather, there are several great craftsmen on this forum. They can identify themselves, if they want to.
Kevin
I have had a few holsters in my short few years carrying and I'm curious what some of the more experienced people on these forums thinking regards to what separates the great holster makers (I.E. Milt Sparks, Kramer, Lobo Leather, Nightengale, Mitch Rosen, El Paso Saddlery, etc...) From the rest of the pack.
Reputation will do it. As a LEO we talked among ourselves, in the Locker Room, before the Internet. So holsters, on and off duty then were leather. A good quality holster is still good after 40+ years of service.
The best holster craftsmen have an ethic higher than the average. They are willing to do whatever it takes to make a superior product regardless of the cost and difficulty. They use the very best materials, best methods, will not cut corners and will not send out a less than perfect product. There are few and far between as most in the business are making mass produced products that they are able to make a big profit on.
What qualities or features do you think separates the best holsters from the rest?
In my opinion, the qualities are leather (I prefer full grain cowhide, vegetable tanned and vacuum dried if possible), sewing detail, finishing and boning (the process of molding the leather to perfectly fit and retain the firearm). Precise boning (which takes time and patience) makes the difference between "This model fits Glocks, Desert Eagles and most revolvers" and "This model will only fit one model gun and it isn't coming out unless you draw it".
I buy leather holsters from a local maker who's a one man band. It takes a while but each holster is made, from leather cutting to packaging, by him. He stamps his name on it.
After buying a lot of different brands that didn't quite work. I have saved a lot of money by just ordering either a Kramer or a Milt Sparks right off the bat. Chest holster is Diamond D. I'm all done giving other holsters a chance. I don't need any more that only sort of work. {either ride at wrong height or wrong angle or to flimsy and poor retention etc etc etc}