GTbob
Member
17 yo's serve too
Yes they do. My son joined the Marines at 17, with my blessing and approval!
17 yo's serve too
Well, it's nice to see that you've bought into the do-gooder philosophy, hook, line and sinker.
But who gets to decide who's "fit" to have a gun? You?
Since you "couldn't care less about some interpretation of the 2A", are there any other amendments, i.e., rights, which you would like to give away while you're at it?
You are correct in that the 2nd mentions nothing about LAW rockets. But it seems to me like the Revolutionary War was fought with cannons...on both sides. Where did the Revolutionary Army get theirs and what granted ordinary people the right to have such things? Seems like old King George really slipped up on that one, eh? A mistake this government won't repeat, as long as it can convince its subjects that they don't need or have any right to own military-equivalent weapons.
Yes they do. My son joined the Marines at 17, with my blessing and approval!
I haven't bought into any philosophy. America was a different country when the 2A was written. Guns were a fact if life in every household, and youngsters were taught early on in their use. Simply put, they were a matter of survival. Today, that is not the case, and I have seen too many people killed or wounded (including with legally bought guns) due to a lack of skill of the shooter. Gun owners will say "and who's going to pay for it", and I say if you have the coin to buy a gun, holster, and ammo, you can pay $50 to take a class.
See, there are gun enthusiasts and gun nuts. Check out youtube videos where retards dress up like Jack Bauer and illustrate their ignorance. You want an AR with a 200 round drum? OK by me (although i think it's overkill and they are usually bought by mall ninjas who want to make believe they are some Spec Ops warrior), learn how to use the thing. If you can't or won't, you shouldn't have them.
Again, you'd feel differently if you saw what I have seen.