USMC586
Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2009
- Messages
- 175
- Reaction score
- 35
Asking here I almost know the answer but here it goes anyway. What would you do given the following scenario?
I live in a ban state that severely restricts hand guns. There are more brands than not that we cannot buy new. Glocks are one of them.
I own a pre ban G 26 that sells for about $700 used. And is very difficult to replace.
I have come across a nice S&W 29-2 4" for $600 and I am on the fence about selling the G for it.
I had a Ruger Super Red Hawk in 44 Mag that I almost never shot. Only because we can't hunt anything but bear with a handgun. (more or less) But the 29 is a thing of beauty and I would love to own such a classic.
So would you give up a great sub compact carry piece for a beautiful 29 that more than likely would not be shot or carried very often?
At 6'3" 270 I could realistically get away with carrying the beast. But what say you? Keep they carry G or go with a classic?
FYI my 340 is my most common carry piece anyway.
I live in a ban state that severely restricts hand guns. There are more brands than not that we cannot buy new. Glocks are one of them.
I own a pre ban G 26 that sells for about $700 used. And is very difficult to replace.
I have come across a nice S&W 29-2 4" for $600 and I am on the fence about selling the G for it.
I had a Ruger Super Red Hawk in 44 Mag that I almost never shot. Only because we can't hunt anything but bear with a handgun. (more or less) But the 29 is a thing of beauty and I would love to own such a classic.
So would you give up a great sub compact carry piece for a beautiful 29 that more than likely would not be shot or carried very often?
At 6'3" 270 I could realistically get away with carrying the beast. But what say you? Keep they carry G or go with a classic?
FYI my 340 is my most common carry piece anyway.