just reported,they're going to use children as props in tomorows news conference. don't ever forget "it's for the children"
Whats so bad about these things? They don't impede anyone rights. They don't take anything away they don't outlaw any guns. I think its the best possible outcome.
............and a Congressman from Texas said today he's readying articles of impeachment if he tries to add one iota to existing laws. It's going to get nasty.
Hon. Harry Reid, Senator and Chair
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee
Fax: (202) 969-0354
Dear Senator Reid:
Before the Great Recession, I contributed money to the DSCC. Then I lost my job, moved for a new opportunity, and now, things are starting to look not so bleak. I contributed, a little, to the President's re-election campaign. I hoped to be able to broaden that out in 2014 to other Democrats.
I am an active markswoman, I have competed in a number of local matches. I have worked, over the last two cycles, to explain to my fellow competitors that no, the Democrats aren't going to take away their guns, that the Democrats had no intention of passing new gun control laws. With some luck, I believe that I persuaded a few of them to give Democratic candidates an honest look.
Well, I am done with that. Between the recent actions of Governor Cuomo in my former home state and with some of the bills that Democrats have discussed introducing, I have found myself having to eat my words.
My wingnut friends were right: A lot of Democrats were just waiting for another tragedy in order to try to pass more gun control laws.
I do not agree with most of the agenda of the GOP. Actually, I find it reprehensible. But now I am finding some of what the Democrats are trying to do equally reprehensible. So I am no longer a "yellow dog" Democrat. And neither is my wallet.
I cannot imagine that I am alone in this sentiment. If the Democrats want to have a hope in Hades of prevailing in 2014, they might do well to keep this in mind.
Sincerely,
This just went out by fax:
This just went out by fax:
just reported,they're going to use children as props in tomorows news conference. don't ever forget "it's for the children"
This was VERY well said. We need a lot more calm and collected, but stern letters like this one to prove we're not a bunch of ya-hoos. Obviously the public doesn't get to see the responsible, respectable gun owners for what they are. They only get the "crazies" and "thugs" in the eyes of the masses. I know I'm not saying anything you guys don't already know, just releasing frustration in a positive manner.
The more harsh background checks could get to be near impossible to pass. Just my thoughts, and I have no facts to base this on, but what if he pushed to the extremes of, say, too many speeding tickets will deny you because it shows your lack of respect for the laws. Or that shoplifting offense as a middle-schooler shows you want to lead a life of crime. It gets a little personal, but I'm putting it out there just as a hypothetical situation.(the hypothetical situation being denied my right to buy/own firearms because of the following. The following really did happen) I was involved in a misfortunate situation (misunderstanding) that lead to me being charged with 12 felonies. It was a long legal battle, but finally got it all sorted out and charges dropped. I am NOT a felon, but now it's on my record that I was charged with 12 felonies. If background checks got more strict, I'm sure I'd no longer be able to buy new firearms. Even though I did nothing wrong, and proved it in court, that showing up on the background check could prove detrimental if stricter regulations went through. I'm just saying, you never know how strict he'd try to go with these background checks.
Obama is shameless.just reported,they're going to use children as props in tomorows news conference. don't ever forget "it's for the children"
I do think maybe someone reiterated to him that January 20th is not a coronation, but an inauguration. Hopefully, it will have sunk in.
My major concern is that few in the US House and the US Senate will have the political will-power to challenge much of what is made by edict of Executive-Order. I hope that I am wrong.
Will any of those currently in Washington DC live up to their oaths that they took upon being sworn-in?
I do think maybe someone reiterated to him that January 20th is not a coronation, but an inauguration. Hopefully, it will have sunk in.
My major concern is that few in the US House and the US Senate will have the political will-power to challenge much of what is made by edict of Executive-Order. I hope that I am wrong.
Will any of those currently in Washington DC live up to their oaths that they took upon being sworn-in?
And what are these 19 recommendations? The article does not say.