I don't know, but.....
I've been shooting since I was 8, and am over 60 now.
I have seen plenty of Colts, Rugers, Ubertis, that do not have the drag line, and have function very well. I'm not saying that all revolvers, of the above makers noted, do not have a drag line,
but I have seen many many more S&W with the drag line than most of the other three mentioned.
Why could S&W/Colt/Ruger/etc., not make a slight depression around the cylinder where the line appears ? Sometimes, it's just a matter of aesthetics, but for the uninformed (like me) it just looks terrible, and is heart breaking for the first time buyers to see that they have damaged their brand new revolver through no fault of their own.
It's just a VERY ugly result, that although you say is very important to the correct function of the revolver, has always bothered me (I know, "get a life!" is what your saying) (
)
I've been shooting since I was 8, and am over 60 now.
I have seen plenty of Colts, Rugers, Ubertis, that do not have the drag line, and have function very well. I'm not saying that all revolvers, of the above makers noted, do not have a drag line,
but I have seen many many more S&W with the drag line than most of the other three mentioned.
Why could S&W/Colt/Ruger/etc., not make a slight depression around the cylinder where the line appears ? Sometimes, it's just a matter of aesthetics, but for the uninformed (like me) it just looks terrible, and is heart breaking for the first time buyers to see that they have damaged their brand new revolver through no fault of their own.
It's just a VERY ugly result, that although you say is very important to the correct function of the revolver, has always bothered me (I know, "get a life!" is what your saying) (


Last edited: