It must remembered that Massad Ayoob was a working cop. Cops are subjected to a high level of scrutiny in any shooting situation and claims of unnecessary force are quite common. Adding hand-loaded ammunition to a police shooting is like handing the deed for your house to a lawyer.
It must remembered that Massad Ayoob was a working cop. Cops are subjected to a high level of scrutiny in any shooting situation and claims of unnecessary force are quite common. Adding hand-loaded ammunition to a police shooting is like handing the deed for your house to a lawyer.
Joe Homeowner acting in defense of his family is not expected to have a department-issued firearm or approved ammunition. The level of scrutiny and range of criticism will never be at the same level as expected in a police shooting situation.
If you are confident in your homemade ammunition I see no reason not to use it for self-defense purposes. If the subject is raised in court I would expect most jurors to understand the difference between $30 per box for store-bought ammo and $6.50 per box for roll-your-own.
IF this is not internet BS, please post a link to actual case where this has happened..
I think I agree with the OPs initial post - Buffalo Bore has proven there is a market for $1/round, and it seems like big manufacturers are following suit. It's getting harder to find 50 rd boxes of self defense ammo, and Federal for one is moving to the Buffalo Bore scheme of selling 20 round boxes for over $1 a round. I don't know if Hornady ever sold 50 rd boxes of self defense ammo, but all my LGS has is 20 round boxes at a premium price.
I would carry my reloads without hesitation, but lately my Hornady Lock and Load does not like to seat primers. If I can get it working right, I'll likely start carrying my own reloads in some calibers, though I really have no complaint with the Underwoods I've been carrying for years.
Common Internet wisdom over the past 20 years has been: “Do not use reloads for self defense because you might get sued by the scumbag or his family and their scumbag attorney looking to extort money from you. Maybe even accuse you of murder.”
The “rational” (for lack of a better word) is that you used ammo that did more damage that resulted in serious injury or death to their upstanding client. As absurd as allof that is, they, supposedly, will convince a jury of the lowest common denominator of this and have your head on a platter.
However, with rising ammo costs, even common good quality ammo like Winchester, Remington and Federal costing as much as a dollar a round (something that used to be said of Buffalo Bore only a few years ago), isn’t there a basic logical reasoning for reloading your own ammo for practice and self-defense?
After all, 1) you want ammo that you can practice with frequently and that is consistant in POA with what you are carrying. 2) you can make ammo as good or better and for only a fraction of what it costs factory made.
All of this is in the interest of not only yourself but your family and those around you to make sure you can shoot accurately and are less likely to miss.
I was looking online and in store for .38 Spl+p LHP Remington, Winchester and Federal. All of them amount to $50+ (taxes, shipping, etc) for a box of $50. Not something anybody can practice with regularly and not something anybody can afford to buy in any great quantity.
Only a year or so ago, you could buy a box for $30. (Maybe less)
But, using Hornandy 158gr LSWCHP bullets and 5.2-5.4 gr of unique and a CCI 500 primer in a reused nickle plated case, you can reload the same round for almost nothing.
I UNDERSTAND YOUR FEAR OF HAVING YOUR RELOADS ATTACKED IN A JURY TRIAL. WHETHER REAL OR NOT, THAT THREAT CAN BE ELIMINATED BY THE PURCHASE OF ONE BOX OF HIGH END AMMO---SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED FOR SELF DEFESE USE. LOAD YOUR WEAPON WITH THIS AMMO, WHENEVER YOU CARRY IT......
SINCE SD INCIDENTS ARE USUALLY CONDUCTED AT A RANGE OF 7 YARDS OR SO---IT SHOULD BE EASY TO REPLICATE THE PERFORMANCE OF YOUR CARRY AMMO, WITH A RELOAD THAT WILL ALSO SHOOT POI TO POA AT THAT SHORT DISTANCE.....
ONCE YOU DEVELOP SUCH A LOAD, YOU CAN PRACTICE WITH IT ECONOMICALLY, TO YOUR HEART'S CONTENT......
I UNDERSTAND YOUR FEAR OF HAVING YOUR RELOADS ATTACKED IN A JURY TRIAL. WHETHER REAL OR NOT, THAT THREAT CAN BE ELIMINATED BY THE PURCHASE OF ONE BOX OF HIGH END AMMO---SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED FOR SELF DEFESE USE. LOAD YOUR WEAPON WITH THIS AMMO, WHENEVER YOU CARRY IT......
SINCE SD INCIDENTS ARE USUALLY CONDUCTED AT A RANGE OF 7 YARDS OR SO---IT SHOULD BE EASY TO REPLICATE THE PERFORMANCE OF YOUR CARRY AMMO, WITH A RELOAD THAT WILL ALSO SHOOT POI TO POA AT THAT SHORT DISTANCE.....
ONCE YOU DEVELOP SUCH A LOAD, YOU CAN PRACTICE WITH IT ECONOMICALLY, TO YOUR HEART'S CONTENT......
Ammo costs are not rising, so there's no rationale for the question.
.
I use Hornady Critical Defense ammo in my carry pieces because it is an excellent ammo, and if I ever have to testify, I will testify that my personal defense is critical, so I use high quality, reliable Hornady Critical Defense ammo.
My take on reloads is that you are potentially giving the prosecutor one more thing to talk about. A person does not want the prosecutor talking about him, as the prosecutor will only say things that may send you to prison. Do not give the prosecutor anything to talk about, as it is only against your interests.
As for skull and crossbones on the stocks, "Watch here; wait for the flash" engraved on the muzzle, t-shirts that read: "Kill them all; Sort it out in hell," these things tend to indicate an intention to kill, not an intention to save an innocent life. That is a step toward a murder/manslaughter conviction, as intention to kill or do damage is an element of murder, while intention to save a life is an element of justified self defense.
I cannot cite any cases, but would love to read the cases if anybody can cite cases where these issues arose.
Mr. Harold Fish was hiking on a trail in AZ when he was attacked and defended himself (killed the attacker) with a 10mm pistol that was judged to be 'overkill'. He ended up in jail for a long term and was only released two years later when they managed to change the law.
Here is a link. Note the absurd charges such as the attackers violent past being inadmissible, but Mr. Fish's history of gun ownership was used against him. He was attacked by the man's three dogs (two of which were scheduled to be destroyed), which Fish first yelled at the guy to control his dogs, then scared them away with warning shots. Then the guy said he was going to kill him and charged. The scene evidence that the man was charging at Fish and about anything else that could be used in his defense was disallowed. Oh, and a few years later they removed the 'convicted felon' label.
The Terrifying and True Harold Fish Story | Buckeye Firearms Association