Whit
Well-known member
You can glean from reading posts on this forum that the J Frame is a very popular carry option. And for many good reasons that is so. But you can also surmise from the same posts that the 2” version is seemingly the choice of most folks who carry a J Frame.
Thus the question, why is the 3” version less popular? On the surface it would seem that the 3” would have some advantages. It might produce more velocity, perhaps better balance, maybe a tad less recoil with extra weight or a more shootable/natural pointing revolver. Certainly the one extra inch cannot be much harder to conceal. It is interesting that the 3” K Frame is more desireable than the 2”, but the J seems to be just the reverse.
Your observations and comments please.
Thus the question, why is the 3” version less popular? On the surface it would seem that the 3” would have some advantages. It might produce more velocity, perhaps better balance, maybe a tad less recoil with extra weight or a more shootable/natural pointing revolver. Certainly the one extra inch cannot be much harder to conceal. It is interesting that the 3” K Frame is more desireable than the 2”, but the J seems to be just the reverse.
Your observations and comments please.