Capt Steve
US Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2008
- Messages
- 1,678
- Reaction score
- 3,014
The rule of two:
1 is none
2 is one
Just goes to show that there are 3 kinds of people on earth: those that can do math and those that can't. (o;
The rule of two:
1 is none
2 is one
I carry two pretty much all the time on duty and off. Exception being the occasional assignment where I can only carry one and at those times it is the 37-2.
You never know when your primary will lay down. You may not be able to access your primary due to injury or it may be trapped during a fight.
If you are comfortable carrying one weapon and have a plan for when it doesn't work then at least you are thinking about your options. For those of you that believe that if you can't solve the problem with x number rounds and it is "your time" then I would submit that you have lost the fight before it ever began and offer this quote from Dr. Alexis Artwohl for your consideration "You need to train hard to prevail, not just survive. Even then if you can't prevail you should do everything you can to survive, if you can't survive you need to take the ************ with you. Don't put your family through a trial"
It's not about lead. It's about being prepared for a mechanical failure that can happen at any time.
Respectfully, I think some folks are kidding themselves. Mechanical failures and/or user error can and will happen at the worst possible time.
So, why don't we make a list of reasons why some of us think it's a good idea to carry two or more guns?
Those that disagree can list thier reasons.
But let's leave out responses like "because I can" or "I'm too lazy".
Also carrying the best available handgun should circumvent all but the most serious issue regarding reliability.I drive the best possible vehicle I can afford so I don`t have a breakdown going through Detroit,I don`t tow a spare vehicle behind it.
I carry either 2 or 3 on me whenever possible.
.44 snubby in my pocket, fullsize and/or compact 1911s in .45 acp on my hip and/or shoulder holster.
2 full size mags for the 1911 and 1-2 speedloaders for the .44.
Jim
Think about the origins of the concept. Ever wonder why you often see Samurai swords in sets of 2 or 3? A big one and some smaller ones. Why did cavalry riders carry 2 pistols. In combat, you fight with everything you've got - you are only limited by what you brought (and you never know when you are going to a fight). How much you bring must be balanced with what is expedient and practical - you don't want to limit your mobility by wearing too much body armor or by having to tote that M60, plus the ammo belts. Sure we can't all be 100% prepared for every contingency, but the BUG concept exists for a reason (several reasons, many very valid ones listed in this thread): because cops got their guns taken away, or ran out of ammo, or their gun jammed up, or got shot, or got knocked down and dropped their gun, or were faced with a situation where they needed to arm someone else, etc. The practice has merit and has been proven on the street, with the evidence too often written in blood.
Being prepared with a second gun in case your first fails is probably a good idea,but sometimes due to concealment issues it`s not possible. Also carrying the best available handgun should circumvent all but the most serious issue regarding reliability.
You carry a .44 snubby in your pocket?!
Yup... have it there right now as a matter of fact...
![]()
Jim
I believe it is inbetween a K and an L.
I am 6'4" 310ish lbs, 42x36 pants, 3-4x shirts, 54" chest... so I have an easier time concealing than most.
Here it is compared to a 629 2.5" snubby.
![]()
A J from would certainly be easier to carry than my .44 for pretty much anyone... and I am concidering a J frame down the road... but I love my big bores.
No galluses, just a decent belt.
Jim