Model 627 is an eyesore!

Marinerman

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2011
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Location
Los Angeles
I just got my 627 Pro. The matte stainless is an eyesore. I didn't realize it would look that bad after seeing pictures, but I was wrong. It's too bad Smith & Wesson had to get lazy and mass produce their guns with machines. The trigger and hammer are bare metal. Uglier than sin. I'm taking my revolver to a gunsmith he's going to polish out and make it as stainless steel as possible. Including the triggers and hammer. If I can get close enough to my SP101 in sheen I'll be happy. I'm too old fashion to like this matte color.
 
Register to hide this ad
Funny how most of us have a particular vision and specific tastes in firearms, finishes, sights, etc..

Is your 627 a bead blast finish?

I love that look, but understand that everyone does!

My 66 snub is soon to get a full working over....with a bead blast finish too!!
 
OK you buy your guns for looks, I buy mine to shoot. Fair enough. Personally I think my 627PC shoots really sweet. Do you buy your guns for looks but without holding them first ? Better luck next time, though the 627PC happens to be my favorite .357 magnum, and I think it would be pretty tough for me to beat. Then it is a personal matter and we each get to pick and choose based upon our personal prejudices. Better luck next time. Have you tried Ruger ?
 
I just got my 627 Pro. The matte stainless is an eyesore. I didn't realize it would look that bad after seeing pictures, but I was wrong. It's too bad Smith & Wesson had to get lazy and mass produce their guns with machines. The trigger and hammer are bare metal. Uglier than sin. I'm taking my revolver to a gunsmith he's going to polish out and make it as stainless steel as possible. Including the triggers and hammer. If I can get close enough to my SP101 in sheen I'll be happy. I'm too old fashion to like this matte color.

The matted bead blast finish is nothing new to Smith and Wesson. They have been using it for decades. Competition firearms made of stainless steel are usually matted to reduce or eliminate glare.

Here is a pic of my 2 year old 627 next to my to my 26 year old 625.

009_zpsc02cc5ec.jpg
 
I just got my 627 Pro. The matte stainless is an eyesore. I didn't realize it would look that bad after seeing pictures, but I was wrong. It's too bad Smith & Wesson had to get lazy and mass produce their guns with machines. The trigger and hammer are bare metal. Uglier than sin. I'm taking my revolver to a gunsmith he's going to polish out and make it as stainless steel as possible. Including the triggers and hammer. If I can get close enough to my SP101 in sheen I'll be happy. I'm too old fashion to like this matte color.

The first S&W revolver I ever bought was a beautiful nickle plated 19-2. The next was a satin-finished 28-2. Over thirty years later, I've seen and owned S&W revolvers and pistols with finishes ranging from matte/satin blued and stainless steel to high polished blue. There is something simply satisfying about the deep bluing of a S&W revolver or a S&W revolver done up in nickle plate. Reality is that neither finish will stand up well to hard heavy use. But, I love them regardless.

When it comes to a pistol that will be used and even used hard, stainless steel in a satin or matte finish is absolutely the way to go. On my side as I write this is a 625-2 which has a satin finish. If it were a carbon steel revolver, I'd prefer it to have a high polish and blue job. That's just my preference. However it is a stainless steel revolver. It was produced with an eye to competition. I have used it hard for thousands of rounds and find that the satin finish is just about ideal. There are a few rubs, etc. that would probably polish out. One day I might get around to it. I have a 686-1 that demonstrates a high level of polish. I think with a bit of attention, it might even be made to look like a nice nickle plated finish. But, for routine heavy use, the satin stainless steel finish is ideal.

Do try to consider that S&W produces an extremely broad product line. That is one of the reasons so many folks consider S&W the preeminent revolver manufacturer. S&W produces a revolver for just about any need or desire that one can conceive. The vast majority of folks very much like the finishes used by S&W. There are options available. The Performance Center would be a good place to look for finish options, etc. But to consider a satin finish on a revolver to be evidence of laziness, etc. is illogical. As well since the turn of the 20th century there has not been any handmade firearms commonly produced. All firearms of any type beyond shop models are mass produced.

You own a very high-end S&W revolver. No other current manufacturer produces anything of comparable quality. If you desire to have it customized to suit your own needs, contact some of the shops that do quality work. Without doubt they will be able to meet your individual needs. Sincerely. brucev.
 
All the polishing in the world isn't going to make it any more stainless steel than it already is! ;)

Actually, polishing out the trigger and hammer would be a great improvement over the faux case hardened finish. I did that to my 686-6 and am very pleased with the look (actually almost as nice looking as my Rugers). Even if it is MIM rather than stainless (don't really know), it looks great.

http://i880.photobucket.com/albums/ac5/at_liberty/7da4ef98-a8c5-4cf3-8989-3155a487796a.jpg

My 625JM has the matte finish and bright trigger and hammer, so that's the model I followed.
 
Last edited:
BUYERS REMORSE

For getting exactly what you ordered & payed for. If you like your stainless shiny, why in the world would you order & pay that big $ for matte? It would have been easy enough to find an example of their matte in a lgs. NOW you are going to throw good $ after bad to make it into what you should have ordered in the first place. If it is still NIB, might you be able to return/exchange/sell it and buy what you want, HOW you want it. "too bad S&W mass produces their guns with machines", now what exactly should they be mass producing them with? Did you really expect YOUR gun to be made start to finish on a one at a time basis by one individual master pistolsmith, for that price? IMO, NOT S&W's fault.There are plenty of quality (like fords) custom shops that can do any type of finish you want, Chrome is real shiny. Beauty is skin deep, performance is to the bone. My first choice for looks is a classic deep blue, like on old colts, but a gun intended for hard frequent use, matte is easier to maintain an even appearance. Eventually any finish used hard enough will pick up some rubs/scratches/wear/fading & look a bit uneven, it won't affect how it shoots. I did have my 681 polished by a lgs that did a nice job for not a lot of $ (to get rid of some scratches/rubs) for a possible sale & many asked if I had it nickel plated. Using it every week, at least, I don't expect it to last forever.
 
Last edited:
I'm confused. Is it a bead finish? If so, I'd be hard pressed to change that.
Is it satin? I could see working that a bit for a more uniform/softer satin or a high gloss to mirror finish.
Good luck!
 
The matte finish isn't too attractive, but I can live with it. The brushed finishes I like just fine. Polished is too much.

That said I'm not too picky. My last two I stumbled upon in nickel, though they are the devil to up keep.
 
When you send a stainless revolver off for a combat treatment, they soften all the corners, and bead blast the whole thing. For two reasons, it makes it easier to blend in all the work, and to make it less flashy.

I agree there is no room to complain, when you get what you ordered and paid for, and it functions as it should. Ed
 
Oh no! S&W is mass producing their guns...... And then they finish with a matt stainless look.....Even though I already own a 627 Pro,


I'd help you out and take that sub-standard piece of **** off your hands, so you don't have to look at it any more. :D
 
Last edited:
Actually, polishing out the trigger and hammer would be a great improvement over the faux case hardened finish. I did that to my 686-6 and am very pleased with the look (actually almost as nice looking as my Rugers). Even if it is MIM rather than stainless (don't really know), it looks great.

http://i880.photobucket.com/albums/ac5/at_liberty/7da4ef98-a8c5-4cf3-8989-3155a487796a.jpg

My 625JM has the matte finish and bright trigger and hammer, so that's the model I followed.

Actually, stainless steel is stainless steel irrespective of the finish it is wearing. This was the whole point of my statement, so I'm not quite sure why you quoted me unless you missed it. :D
 
Darn! I didn't realize you could polish the trigger and hammer on the 686-6.
I thought that ugly was to the bone.
Now I know what I'll be doing tonight after work.
 
When it comes to a pistol that will be used and even used hard, stainless steel in a satin or matte finish is absolutely the way to go.

Do try to consider that S&W produces an extremely broad product line.

Every handgun I own (not very many, mind you) is stainless because they live in safes that collect moisture or they ride on my sweat-prone body or travel with me out on the desert. Several show evidence of rubbing on something or other forms of neglect. In fact, I look for such wear in buying a gun. I expect that, usually, the action will have been smoothed from use on such a gun.

I guess that I look old and beat up and I prefer guns that do also. :D
 

Latest posts

Back
Top