Threads such as this make me chuckle. Lots of opinions about the superiority of revolvers, and the inferiority of "bottom feeders".
I own quite a few revolvers. Multiple Dan Wessons & Rugers, a respectable collection of S&Ws, and a smattering of Colts. I don't keep track of the numbers, but I suspect my semi-autos outnumber my revolvers. I love my revolvers, and I truly enjoy shooting them. The power and accuracy are great. I rarely, if ever, go shooting without taking along at least one revolver.
But...lets keep things in perspective. Semi-autos are popular for a reason. They're generally lighter, slimmer and more compact, easier to carry, spare magazines are slimmer & easier to carry than speedloaders, reloading is quicker, and requires less fine-motor-skills, which is a boon in a high stress situation...and of course, they generally hold more rounds. They come in powerful chamberings, and are plenty accurate.
You can call the semi-autos "bottom-feeders", "Glock-a-matics", "Jammamatics", or plastic toy-guns all you wish. But...they're here to stay. The semi-autos currently available are reliable & accurate, and easy to carry & conceal.
I love my revolvers. I have no plans to sell any of them...and I hope to acquire at least a few more. But, my daily carry gun is a semi-auto (with a 642 as a BUG, frequently), and I don't see that changing. I guess my point is...isn't it possible to enjoy our revolvers, without having to dump all over the semi-autos? Just sounds like sour grapes.
Tim