How many of us have siblings?

Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
5,320
To qualify the guns must be identical in their features, and within 1000 in regards to their serial number. I only have twins to start this thread with.

I found the first Model 10 no dash 2 inch round butt gun a couple of months ago. Yesterday I stumbled upon its twin in similar condition. The diamond magnas match and the gun is in very nice shape. They are both 4 screw guns dating 1960. I hope the new one shoots as well as the first one I bought. The lyrics "reunited and it feels so good" come to mind :) please share your siblings!!

e869436fdf478eeeae91be6c8cf1b555.jpg
05525b71e1f9a25fe54d67c6a664be5a.jpg
7a734c50dd2aacd5d568146ccc2d93a0.jpg
e8fef2d0909f4816fd1adc02bfe5b908.jpg


Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 
Register to hide this ad
44 Magnums, S166292 and S166293, shipped as a pair with consecutive serial numbers (and incidentally, consecutive assembly numbers which are really rare) to Camfour, Inc., Springfield, MA on July 12, 1956. Cost for the pair was $176.00 ($10.00 charge for consecutive serial numbers). The pair was ordered on July 10, 1956. The custom case is by Huey.

Click on the photo for a closer look at this pair of great 44s!

Bill

orig.jpg
 
Do 'fraternal twins' count for honorable mention? Here's a pair of round and square butt circa 1905 produced .38 Hand Ejector Targets. The round butt has unknown manufacturer but period original round-to-square grips (handwritten WW1 stateside reservist name and date inside). These two are 929 apart. They are both pre-5-screw 4-screw target frames.
61266 is square butt.
62195 is round butt.
 

Attachments

  • 1902 targets.jpg
    1902 targets.jpg
    134.6 KB · Views: 33
Last edited:
Prototype Model 66s, K949138 and K949140, built in May 1970 as part of a run to 100 revolvers to test the tooling for the stainless Combat Magnum. Each kept in the factory collection for five years and shipped to G. T. Distributors, Rossville, GA in 1975. Each revolver is in its original silver box.

Click on the photos for a much closer look!

Bill

orig.jpg


orig.jpg
 
Last edited:
44 Magnums, S166292 and S166293, shipped as a pair with consecutive serial numbers (and incidentally, consecutive assembly numbers which are really rare) to Camfour, Inc., Springfield, MA on July 12, 1956. Cost for the pair was $176.00 ($10.00 charge for consecutive serial numbers). The pair was ordered on July 10, 1956. The custom case is by Huey.

Click on the photo for a closer look at this pair of great 44s!

Bill

Fabulous, Doc! I'm starting to see what the deep end of the pool looks like!:)
 
K-22's K222, K618, K855, K857, K861

I don't have access to pictures this weekend. K857 became a Kay Chuk and I have not lettered it to learn its factory configuration when shipped.

Does the Kay Chuk have a frame mounted firing pin? If so, that's a dead giveaway it started life as a 22 rimfire.
 
My Favorite Siblings & Their Other Brothers

I hope these two siblings are welcome here:
Reg Magnums 2635 & 2636...

mitch_d-albums-mitch_d-album-picture17192-siblings-rm-2635-2636-a.jpg


Here's a family photo of them with their 18 Other Brothers...

mitch_d-albums-mitch_d-album-picture17191-butte-police-1940s.jpg


Butte Police Dept. Butte, Montana. About 1940.
They're packing 20 Registered Magnums from the same August 18, 1937 shipment.
I never have been able to answer the question of who got which gun.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the heads up, Steve.
It took Stumble-Fingers here a few extra attempts to post.
 
No twins, still looking

I picked up a 1905 3rd change target several years ago. I had the opportunity to enter a ship date request with Roy, and here is his response: "Ray, 38 M&P serial 174263. You have your choice as it is a double number gun, now go find its mate. This serial number was shipped first in August 1911 and the second gun was shipped in September 1911." Good luck. So I actually have a twin but not a set of twins. How do you ever find that needle.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN1879.JPG
    DSCN1879.JPG
    130 KB · Views: 18
  • DSCN1883.JPG
    DSCN1883.JPG
    133 KB · Views: 15
  • DSCN1888.JPG
    DSCN1888.JPG
    132.7 KB · Views: 16
  • DSCN1880.JPG
    DSCN1880.JPG
    141.5 KB · Views: 17
Doug, I appreciate the pair of RMs even more than when you got them, and I'll bet you do too.
I was thinking that maybe you had gotten 18 more!
Lets hear it for the Butte PD, well dressed and well outfitted,eh?
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top